TRANSCRIPCIÓNEnglish

Mehdi Hasan vs. ‘Professor’ Jiang

28m 45s5,373 palabras790 segmentsEnglish

TRANSCRIPCIÓN COMPLETA

0:00

Some have called you China's

0:01

Nostradamus. You had three famous

0:03

predictions in 2024. That Trump would

0:05

get elected, that he would start a war

0:06

with Iran, and that he would lose a war

0:08

with Iran. Iran clearly has they should

0:11

take advantage. I think the next step in

0:13

the escalation ladder is that Trump will

0:15

send in ground forces.

0:17

>> Nikki Haley was key to your prediction

0:19

about Iran. You said Trump would pick

0:21

her as his running mate, but he didn't

0:23

pick her. I think that the problem with

0:25

education is that it focuses too much on

0:28

facts, too much on rigor, and not enough

0:30

on imagination

0:31

>> on facts. Do you hear yourself? Does

0:33

China control what you say? Now, your

0:34

critics might say they're using you as a

0:37

propagandist.

0:38

>> It is possible I'm a useful idiot. And I

0:40

suspect that there are many entities

0:41

around the world who would like to

0:43

amplify my message, including the

0:44

Chinese government.

0:45

>> Hold on. Hold on. You don't call

0:46

yourself Professor Giang on your YouTube

0:48

channel? I do now, but when I first

0:50

started out, if you go way back to my

0:52

>> Doesn't matter when you first started

0:53

out. You do call yourself Professor Jag

0:55

and you're not a professor. What is your

0:56

big prediction now for 2026? We'll see

0:58

what happens. We can test it out at the

1:00

end of the year.

1:06

>> Back in 2024, Chinese Canadian educator

1:10

Jiang posted a video on his YouTube

1:12

channel, Predictive History, where he

1:14

laid out three big predictions. Donald

1:16

Trump would win the 2024 election. The

1:18

US would then go to war with Iran and

1:20

ultimately the US would lose that war.

1:23

Since then, the self-styled professor

1:25

who says he uses game theory to analyze

1:27

the past and predict future geopolitical

1:30

events has become an internet sensation

1:32

and has even been dubbed China's

1:34

Nostradamus. But he's also faced some

1:36

criticisms over his predictions and many

1:38

would say pretty out there conspiracy

1:40

theories. Two out of three of Jiang's

1:43

big predictions have come true. But how

1:45

much of that is his own geopolitical

1:46

foresight? And how much of it simply

1:48

comes down to luck? How much does the

1:50

Chinese government control or even

1:51

influence what he says, what he

1:53

predicts? I decided to not just speak to

1:56

Shuin Jang aka Professor Jiang about

1:59

Iran and the state of the world, but

2:01

also to challenge him a bit. Here's our

2:04

interview.

2:06

Chin Jiang, thank you so much for

2:07

joining me on Zateo. Um, you have said

2:10

you use game theory to predict future

2:12

geopolitical events. For those who have

2:14

never heard of game theory, please do

2:16

explain what it is and how it helps you

2:18

explain what's happening with Donald

2:19

Trump and with Iran in particular.

2:22

>> Right. So game theory applied to

2:24

geopolitics means that we see each

2:26

individual nation state as a player in a

2:29

zero sum game to maximize um its uh

2:33

individual interests. And so each player

2:37

would have its own characteristics, its

2:39

own strengths and it would adopt a OCM

2:41

strategy in order to win the zero sum

2:43

game. So how does that apply in the

2:45

Middle East right now?

2:47

>> Right. So um United States is attacking

2:52

Iran and these two nation states have

2:55

different strengths and weaknesses. So

2:57

America has um the world's greatest

3:00

military. It has a supremacy. It it has

3:03

tremendous technology. um and has

3:05

unlimited funding. And so Iran is

3:08

adopting an asymmetrical strategy of um

3:12

holding the global economy hostage

3:13

meaning that rather than attack the

3:14

United States directly which he cannot

3:16

defeat directly it is instead um

3:20

controlling humus which is strangling

3:22

the global economy and it's attacking

3:24

the GCC nations um the infrastructure of

3:27

the GCC nations in order to force Trump

3:29

into the negotiating table. So that is

3:32

the atmal warfare of Iran.

3:35

>> Uh you've also predicted that the US you

3:37

had three famous predictions in 2024

3:39

that Trump would get elected that he

3:40

would start a war with Iran and that he

3:42

would lose a war with Iran. Based on

3:44

what you've seen over the past month, do

3:45

you still stand by that prediction?

3:48

>> Yes, I do. Um I think that after a month

3:51

I think that um Iran clearly has the

3:54

strateic advantage. What I mean by that

3:57

is that Iran is very clearly able to

4:00

articulate its uh military objectives

4:02

and it has a very clear strategy of how

4:04

to obtain these military objectives and

4:07

it is working uh very hard and very

4:10

meticulously to obtain these objectives.

4:13

This is complete opposite of America

4:15

where Trump has failed to articulate an

4:17

end goal. Um, and right now it seems

4:21

that the administration, the Trump

4:22

administration,

4:24

um, is unable to articulate both a

4:27

strategy and a purpose to the American

4:29

public, which is causing, um, most

4:32

Americans not support this war. It's

4:34

also causing low uh, soldier morale

4:36

among the American forces.

4:38

>> What do you think happens next if slash

4:41

when Iran wins?

4:45

>> Right. So um even though Iran has the

4:48

advantage right now, we still have to

4:51

remember that America is the world's

4:52

greatest empire. It has a lot of

4:53

resources. It has a lot of uh firepower

4:57

still not used. So um um I think the

5:02

next step in the escalation ladder is

5:05

that Trump will send in ground forces.

5:08

So over 5,000 Marines uh and soldiers

5:11

have been dispatched to the Middle East.

5:14

This is already on top of the 50,000

5:17

American soldiers already stationed in

5:19

the Middle East and most military

5:21

analysts expect that um uh the Americans

5:25

will launch an amphibious assault in

5:27

order to control the sh of hummus. Now

5:29

there are several options available to

5:30

Americans um in order to control the sh

5:33

of Hummus. Uh the first option is to

5:35

control Kar Island which is the oil

5:37

depart of the Iranians. 90% of uh

5:40

Iranians oil exports um depart from Kark

5:43

Island. Then you have Kasim Island which

5:46

is opposite the um sh of Homus and then

5:49

there's a naval base uh further down the

5:52

coastline. And so these are the three

5:53

options uh that the Americans have and

5:56

it is unclear which option the Americans

5:58

will ultimately choose. Um but given the

6:01

track record of the Marines, we can

6:03

expect uh the Marines to have an early

6:06

success. The problem with the strategy

6:09

and the problem with America's overall

6:10

strategy is what happens next? How do

6:13

you maintain control over the territory

6:17

that you've claimed? The reality is that

6:19

the Iranians have been preparing this

6:20

battle for about 20 years. They

6:22

developed this um very effective

6:25

asymmetrical warfare strategy of using

6:27

drones and ballistic missiles from afar

6:30

uh hidden in underground bases to um uh

6:34

hit and strike uh American assets around

6:37

the Middle East. This is almost like

6:39

guerrilla warfare and historically um a

6:42

imperial power has had great

6:44

difficulties in containing guerrilla

6:46

warfare. So, unfortunately, the uh

6:49

Americans don't have a long-term

6:52

strategy of how to win this war. Trump

6:55

is still hoping for a quick strike, a

6:57

knockout punch. Um, and he believes that

7:00

the American Marines can deliver this

7:01

knockout punch. Liking this video, then

7:03

don't just watch, hit like, share, and

7:06

subscribe, and tap the bell so you never

7:08

miss a video or live show. But if you

7:10

want early access to exclusive content,

7:12

then you have to head to zateo.com and

7:15

subscribe now. you'll be supporting

7:16

fearless independent journalism.

7:19

>> You uh have made a lot of predictions.

7:22

Um some have called you China's

7:23

Nostradamus. How would you respond to

7:26

those who say, "Sure, you guessed that

7:27

Trump would win in 2024 and he'd go to

7:29

war with Iran." But that wasn't based on

7:31

geopolitical insights or game theory. Uh

7:34

people who follow American politics or

7:36

world politics could have guessed that.

7:38

I think I and many others were warning

7:40

that Trump could win in 2024 and that he

7:42

would escalate with Iran as he did in

DESBLOQUEAR MÁS

Regístrate gratis para acceder a funciones premium

VISOR INTERACTIVO

Mira el video con subtítulos sincronizados, superposición ajustable y control total de la reproducción.

REGÍSTRATE GRATIS PARA DESBLOQUEAR

RESUMEN DE IA

Obtén un resumen instantáneo generado por IA del contenido del video, los puntos clave y las conclusiones.

REGÍSTRATE GRATIS PARA DESBLOQUEAR

TRADUCIR

Traduce la transcripción a más de 100 idiomas con un solo clic. Descarga en cualquier formato.

REGÍSTRATE GRATIS PARA DESBLOQUEAR

MAPA MENTAL

Visualiza la transcripción como un mapa mental interactivo. Comprende la estructura de un vistazo.

REGÍSTRATE GRATIS PARA DESBLOQUEAR

CHATEA CON LA TRANSCRIPCIÓN

Haz preguntas sobre el contenido del video. Obtén respuestas impulsadas por IA directamente desde la transcripción.

REGÍSTRATE GRATIS PARA DESBLOQUEAR

SACA MÁS PARTIDO A TUS TRANSCRIPCIONES

Regístrate gratis y desbloquea el visor interactivo, los resúmenes de IA, las traducciones, los mapas mentales y mucho más. No se requiere tarjeta de crédito.

    Mehdi Hasan vs.… - Transcripción Completa | YouTubeTranscript.dev