TRANSCRIPCIÓNEnglish

"More LUNATIC SOCIALIST Left-Wing Clowns!" | Keir Starmer Leadership Threatened By Andy Burnham

25m 14s3,979 palabras596 segmentsEnglish

TRANSCRIPCIÓN COMPLETA

0:00

Nick H is also on a voice note. Can a

0:02

new leader save Labor?

0:04

>> Morning Mark. It's Nick from Lua. The

0:06

only thing that can save Labor is a

0:09

coalition packed with the Green Party,

0:12

which is why it's so absolutely

0:14

imperative that the the right now unite

0:19

to prevent such a spectre from becoming

0:21

reality. Have a good weekend, Mark.

0:24

>> Nick, thank you for a great voice note.

0:26

I'm delighted to say with me live in the

0:28

studio, one of the most experienced and

0:30

respected journalists in the country,

0:32

the former executive editor of the News

0:33

of the World, Neil Wallace. And down the

0:36

line, a legend of talk, former Met

0:39

Detective Peter Blexley. Gentlemen,

0:42

welcome to the show. And Peter, good to

0:46

see you this morning. Can a new leader

0:48

save Labor?

0:50

>> Well, here we are. It's Select Socialist

0:53

Saturday.

0:55

Will it be Burnon? Will it be Raina?

0:58

Will it be streeting? Or as you've

1:00

pointed out, will Stalmer try and cling

1:02

on? Either way, we should actually

1:04

rename it, lose Labor Saturday, cuz

1:07

that's what the nation desperately

1:09

needs, having been swept to power with

1:12

such a huge majority on essentially what

1:14

was a protest vote just to get the tries

1:17

out. Once again, socialists have proven

1:20

continually that they are utterly unfit,

1:24

inappropriate, and incapable of running

1:26

the country effectively.

1:29

>> It's a great job if you can get it

1:31

though, isn't it, Peter? Because

1:33

Starmmer's replacement, if it happens,

1:34

will have up to three years and a

1:37

healthy majority. So, it's a prize that

1:40

will be fought over.

1:42

>> Yes. And that's all the more reason why

1:44

Stalmer is in this very already

1:46

undignified fashion going to cling on.

1:50

It's clear that he adores the trappings

1:52

of power. He seems drunk on power to me

1:56

and he will cling on. No, no matter

1:58

shamelessly it looks no matter how

2:01

damaging it is to his party and of

2:04

course in more broader terms to the

2:06

nation. He will have to be dragged out

2:09

of number 10, kicking and screaming all

2:12

the way. Although, if anybody ever

2:13

remembers watching him on a punch bag

2:16

some years ago, Stara kicking and

2:19

screaming really wouldn't be too much of

2:21

a challenge for a fouryear-old.

2:22

>> I'd rather the punch bag was running

2:25

Britain. It makes more sense. It's more

2:27

compelling. What about that, Neil

2:29

Wallace? You are the king of the

2:31

headline from Peter Blexley. We've just

2:33

heard the adjectives regarding Karma.

2:35

Shameless. damaging drunk on power.

2:40

>> Yeah.

2:42

>> Go figure.

2:43

>> Go figure.

2:43

>> And in other news.

2:44

>> Yes. So, what's new?

2:46

>> The Pope goes to church every Sunday.

2:48

>> That's right.

2:50

You're spot on, Peter. Of course. In

2:52

particular, particularly your

2:54

interpretation that Stalmar will cling

2:57

on. Uh I mean, don't forget there's not

3:00

many places you can get as many foreign

3:02

trips as he likes to get. you know, the

3:05

he he's not really too interested in

3:08

what happens back here in Great Britain,

3:11

but he does love a foreign trip, doesn't

3:12

he? He, you know, uh the big perk of the

3:16

job for him, I think, is his air miles.

3:18

But the problem is while he's doing

3:20

that, nothing is being resolved back

3:23

here. Have you noticed incidentally how

3:26

Rachel Reeves has essentially been put

3:28

in a box and she's not allowed out to

3:31

wander around make spouting her um her

3:35

her nonsense about the the enormous

3:38

amounts of growth she's generating etc

3:41

etc

3:41

>> she's been benched hasn't she

3:43

>> has totally totally the only time you

3:45

see her is at prime minister's questions

3:47

when she has to sit next behind star and

3:51

that's to make

3:51

>> and her main job is not to cry by the

3:53

way Yes. I'm sorry. You going to say

3:55

that's to make sure that

3:56

>> Well, she the real reason is uh to make

3:59

sure that she's forever branded with

4:01

him, but also she has to be make sure

4:04

that she doesn't laugh at the wrong

4:06

moments. Uh because that's rather

4:08

important with some of the things that

4:10

he comes out with how funny it would be

4:13

if she actually burst out laughing at at

4:15

his nonsense. But there's a serious

4:17

point here, isn't there? That you know,

4:20

we're having this conversation. Um,

4:23

again, as Peter pointed out, at at a

4:25

time of only two years into a five-year

4:28

parliament with a government that's got

4:31

400 MPs and it's chaos, you know, I I

4:36

one of the great things about this show,

4:38

I think, are those voice notes you get.

4:40

Yeah. And you hear ordinary people

4:44

coming in and giving their views from

4:47

Luborough, from Newcastle, from down

4:51

here in London, and they're ordinary

4:54

working people who just can't believe

4:57

what they're witnessing. And um I I'm

5:01

sure Peter probably like me agrees for

5:04

the idea that I do think we're stuck

5:07

with Star.

5:08

>> Wow. Well, that's a great question,

5:10

Peter. What do you think? Will Starmmer

5:12

cling on, undignified as it may be?

5:15

>> Well, let's rewind to the general

5:17

election campaign of 2024. And people

5:20

quite rightly use the analogy that

5:22

Starmer was carrying a Ming vase across

5:25

an ice rink. Um, as long as he didn't

5:28

drop it, he was going to get elected

5:29

into power. And of course, that's

5:31

exactly what happened. He wasn't elected

5:35

into Downing Street because he was seen

5:37

as a wonderful leader or that because he

5:40

had such a manifesto that chimed with

5:42

the public. He got into number 10 purely

5:45

and simply because millions of people

5:48

were sick to death of the Tory party of

5:51

their lamentable efforts at government

5:54

when they actually showed themselves to

5:56

be left-wing liberal flaky pathetic

6:00

progressives to be perfectly honest with

6:02

you. So he got in. He had a huge

6:04

majority. And what has been astonishing

6:07

is just how inept he is at politics. I

6:11

have never known a prime minister in my

6:14

living years who is so bad at the

6:17

dayto-day politicking. He gets it wrong

6:21

time and time again, which is why we've

6:23

had so many U-turns, which is why his

6:26

name is so derogatorily chanted at dance

6:30

matches, football matches, and many

6:32

other locations around the country, and

6:34

why there is a desperate need for people

6:36

to see him gone. But if he's gone

6:40

without a general election, we need to

6:43

be very very cautious because as you've

6:46

pointed out, what could come next?

6:49

Burnham, Raina, streeting, more of these

6:54

lunatic left-wing socialist clowns who

6:58

know that they are only ever good at

7:01

spending other people's money. And when

7:03

that's all run out, where is the

7:05

country? It's bankrupt. Well, that's the

7:08

problem. As Neil brilliantly pointed

7:11

out, Peter, our viewers and listeners

7:13

live in the real world. They work hard

7:16

and they get it. They can see that this

7:19

Labor project is not working. And to

7:21

replace the leader is the territory of

7:24

deck tears on the Titanic, isn't it?

7:27

>> Oh, it definitely is. And of course,

7:29

there will be media outlets and

7:31

commentators and writers and columnists

7:34

absolutely desperate to see Star go. So

7:37

they've got something to write and

7:39

comment about. But it could be an even

7:41

more dangerous thing for the nation

7:45

because if we get an even more left-wing

7:48

rampant socialist clown into number 10

7:52

Downing Street because there's not a

7:54

general election, then all they're going

7:56

to do is raise more taxes, spend more of

7:59

our money, waste more of our money, not

8:02

stop the illegal migration nonsense, and

8:05

and things will simply get worse and not

8:09

better.

8:10

>> That's the problem. Are we in a scenario

8:12

now, Neil Wallace, in which Sakir

8:15

Stalmer for his innumerable failings is

8:18

the least worst option.

8:19

>> Well, that's essentially what Peter is

8:23

pointing out there, isn't it? And it's

8:25

what frankly I've been going on about in

8:28

the studio for some months because I

8:31

don't believe

DESBLOQUEAR MÁS

Regístrate gratis para acceder a funciones premium

VISOR INTERACTIVO

Mira el video con subtítulos sincronizados, superposición ajustable y control total de la reproducción.

REGÍSTRATE GRATIS PARA DESBLOQUEAR

RESUMEN DE IA

Obtén un resumen instantáneo generado por IA del contenido del video, los puntos clave y las conclusiones.

REGÍSTRATE GRATIS PARA DESBLOQUEAR

TRADUCIR

Traduce la transcripción a más de 100 idiomas con un solo clic. Descarga en cualquier formato.

REGÍSTRATE GRATIS PARA DESBLOQUEAR

MAPA MENTAL

Visualiza la transcripción como un mapa mental interactivo. Comprende la estructura de un vistazo.

REGÍSTRATE GRATIS PARA DESBLOQUEAR

CHATEA CON LA TRANSCRIPCIÓN

Haz preguntas sobre el contenido del video. Obtén respuestas impulsadas por IA directamente desde la transcripción.

REGÍSTRATE GRATIS PARA DESBLOQUEAR

SACA MÁS PARTIDO A TUS TRANSCRIPCIONES

Regístrate gratis y desbloquea el visor interactivo, los resúmenes de IA, las traducciones, los mapas mentales y mucho más. No se requiere tarjeta de crédito.

    "More LUNATIC S… - Transcripción Completa | YouTubeTranscript.dev