TRANSCRIPTIONEnglish

I spent $7,000 on ANC headphones so you don't have to – 2026

29m 59s7,155 mots1,003 segmentsEnglish

TRANSCRIPTION COMPLÈTE

0:00

Hey, it's Jasper. And today we're

0:01

talking about the best premium active

0:03

noise canceling headphones. And as you

0:05

can see, I have basically all the latest

0:07

greatest options from Bose, Apple, Sony,

0:09

Sennheiser, Bowers & Wilkins, and more.

0:12

And I've been doing some testing. So, of

0:13

course, I've been using them outside to

0:15

get a sense for how they all perform

0:16

under real-world conditions. But then

0:18

I've also been doing some testing

0:19

inside. So, for example, this is my good

0:22

pal Mikey. He's a headphone testing

0:24

microphone. And I've been using him to

0:25

measure the active noise canceling

0:27

performance in all these. And I have

0:28

some pretty interesting results there.

0:30

Then I also have Clampi. He's a little

0:32

sketchy. I may have built him myself,

0:33

but he allows me to measure the clamping

0:35

force in all these headphones. So, I'll

0:36

talk about that as well as my overall

0:38

impressions on comfort. And then I've

0:40

also done some pretty extensive testing

0:41

on their microphones. So, you'll hear

0:43

how they all perform under both quiet

0:45

and noisy call conditions. And of

0:47

course, we'll talk about sound quality,

0:48

build quality, features, connectivity,

0:50

basically everything you'll need in

0:52

order to make an informed buying

0:53

decision. Before we dive in, one quick

0:55

note. I'm also working on a mega review

0:58

where I'll be comparing the premium

1:00

options against some of these budget and

1:01

mid-price ones. And yes, there are

1:03

actually a few that I really like. So,

1:05

be sure to subscribe so you don't miss

1:07

out on that. All my videos have no

1:08

sponsors. It's just my own testing, own

1:10

research, own opinion. And your support

1:12

really does go a long way. But, enough

1:14

of this groveling. Let's now get into

1:17

the video. To kick things off, let's

1:18

first level set on the prices. And

1:20

remember, this is as of recording in US

1:22

dollars in the United States. But also

1:24

remember that these prices do tend to

1:26

change pretty frequently. So, be sure to

1:27

check the latest. And I have included

1:29

links to all of these in the

1:30

description. Also, if you want to sign

1:32

up for deal alerts in any of these, be

1:34

sure to check out Dip. It's actually the

1:36

service that I built myself. And it just

1:37

allows me to send you an email if I ever

1:39

spot a good deal on the headphones that

1:40

you're interested in. So, then you can

1:42

buy them when their price dips. But now,

1:44

let's talk about active noise canceling

1:46

performance. To test this, I used Mikey

1:49

first to get a baseline measurement

1:50

where I'd have no headphones on. And

1:52

then I'd play a sound. And here's an

1:53

example measurement that I got with pink

1:55

noise. The Y-axis shows how loud. The

1:57

X-axis is the sound frequency. And then

1:59

I'd repeat this process but with

2:00

different set of headphones on his ears

2:02

and ANC on. And the difference between

2:04

the lines would be how much sound is

2:06

blocked by both passive and active noise

2:08

cancellation. And to try to avoid any

2:10

anomalies, I did it with jet engine

2:12

noise as well as pink noise. And I took

2:14

multiple measurements over multiple

2:15

days. So, I'm pretty happy with what I

2:16

got. But do keep in mind, I am just a

2:18

dude in a room and I'm not some

2:20

million-dollar lab. But now, let's look

2:22

at my preliminary results. This table

2:24

shows the average decibel reduction for

2:26

each headphone with ANC on. And as a

2:28

reminder, the more decibels reduced, the

2:30

better. I do say these are preliminary

2:32

results because after comparing them

2:33

with my own anecdotal testing, I

2:35

realized that it's only telling a

2:37

partial story. So, the good news is I

2:39

figured out why and I have some better

2:41

results that paint a more accurate

2:42

picture. The bad news is we're going to

2:44

have to align on the fundamentals of ANC

2:46

tech and some quirks of human hearing in

2:48

order to get to that. So, I'm going to

2:50

try to do double duty where I'm going to

2:51

explain all of this while testing the

2:54

microphones on all these so you can hear

2:55

how they perform. So, first, you'll hear

2:57

me using them in a quiet room. And then

2:59

about 10 seconds into each segment, I'll

3:01

play some background noise and you'll be

3:02

able to get a sense for how the

3:03

microphone handles noisy conditions. And

3:05

for reference, this is what that

3:06

background noise will sound like.

3:10

A lot of people say active noise

3:12

canceling works by playing an opposite

3:14

sound. But what does that actually mean?

3:15

Let's say you want to block an external

3:17

sound that's around 500 hertz. What's

3:19

the opposite of a 500 hertz sound? Well,

3:22

that doesn't exactly exist. But what

3:24

does exist is a 500 hertz sound that is

3:26

phase shifted. So, it's actually just

3:28

another 500 hertz sound, but it's timed

3:30

perfectly so that the peaks of the sound

3:32

waves that you want to neutralize are

3:33

perfectly out of sync with the peaks of

3:36

the waves you're creating to cancel it

3:37

out. When these two waves interact, they

3:39

end up netting out to silence. And this

3:40

is a process called destructive

3:42

interference. But crucially, this phase

3:44

shift mechanism gets a lot harder to

3:46

pull off above around 1,000 hertz or so.

3:49

And just for reference, this is what

3:50

1,000 hertz sounds like.

3:54

It's harder to cancel at higher

3:55

frequencies because they physically have

3:56

much shorter wavelengths. So, for

3:58

example, a 1,000 hertz sound wave is

4:00

around 1.1 feet long. And a 100 hertz

4:02

sound wave is 11 feet long. So, this

4:05

means that your margin for error with

4:06

producing that phase shifted sound is

4:08

much smaller for higher frequencies. If

4:10

you have an 11 foot long sound wave and

4:12

your phase shifted sound is off by,

4:13

let's say, 6 inches or so, you're still

4:15

going to cancel out most of that sound.

4:17

But if you're off by 6 inches on, let's

4:19

say, a 12 inch long sound wave, you're

4:21

not going to be canceling out much. And

4:23

it's really unfortunate that phase shift

4:25

ANC gets less effective above around

4:27

1,000 hertz or so because it turns out

4:29

that human ears are actually most

4:30

sensitive to sounds that are between

4:32

2,000 and 5,000 hertz. And to illustrate

4:35

this, I'm going to play two tones that

4:36

are actually being played at the same

4:38

level of loudness.

4:39

[Laughter]

4:42

See how you can hear the 2,000 hertz

4:44

tone much more clearly? Bringing this

4:45

back to ANC, since not all sounds are

4:47

created equal to human ears, this also

4:49

means that not all sound reductions are

4:51

created equal. And that means that

4:53

you're more likely to notice a sound

4:54

reduction that's around 1,500 hertz than

4:56

150 hertz. When we look at my revised

4:59

ANC results next, you'll see I applied a

5:01

weighting system that's actually called

5:03

A-weighting. And it more heavily values

5:05

reductions in sounds that humans are

5:06

more sensitive to and values reductions

5:08

in sounds that humans are less sensitive

5:10

to a little bit less. And I'm sure some

5:12

of you are probably screaming at the

5:13

monitor saying, "Hey Jasper, if phase

5:15

shift ANC basically stops working above

5:17

1,000 hertz, wouldn't that mean that all

5:18

ANC headphones would basically perform

5:20

the same above 1,000 hertz, too?" And

5:22

that's actually the really interesting

5:23

thing. Turns out, no. In these higher

5:25

frequencies, it's actually kind of where

5:26

the real ANC battle seems to be doing

5:28

its part.

5:29

I can see in my test measurements that

5:31

some headphones are more effective at

5:32

canceling out these mid-range sounds

5:34

than others. And I can prove that it's

5:35

not just from better passive isolation.

5:37

And while this mid-range ANC is not as

5:39

powerful as it is with those lower

5:40

frequencies, since humans are more

5:42

sensitive to that mid-range, even small

5:44

reductions here can make a meaningful

5:46

impact.

5:46

There's not much public information

5:48

about this, but I've been told by an

5:49

expert that in addition to phase shift

5:51

ANC, there's actually another mechanism

5:53

at play. It's called active damping. And

5:56

it works by using the diaphragm of the

5:58

speaker in the headphone to absorb sound

6:00

waves around the head.

DÉBLOQUER PLUS

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement pour accéder aux fonctionnalités premium

VISUALISEUR INTERACTIF

Regardez la vidéo avec des sous-titres synchronisés, une superposition réglable et un contrôle total de la lecture.

INSCRIVEZ-VOUS GRATUITEMENT POUR DÉBLOQUER

RÉSUMÉ IA

Obtenez un résumé instantané généré par l'IA du contenu de la vidéo, des points clés et des principaux enseignements.

INSCRIVEZ-VOUS GRATUITEMENT POUR DÉBLOQUER

TRADUIRE

Traduisez la transcription dans plus de 100 langues en un seul clic. Téléchargez dans n'importe quel format.

INSCRIVEZ-VOUS GRATUITEMENT POUR DÉBLOQUER

CARTE MENTALE

Visualisez la transcription sous forme de carte mentale interactive. Comprenez la structure en un coup d'œil.

INSCRIVEZ-VOUS GRATUITEMENT POUR DÉBLOQUER

DISCUTER AVEC LA TRANSCRIPTION

Posez des questions sur le contenu de la vidéo. Obtenez des réponses alimentées par l'IA directement à partir de la transcription.

INSCRIVEZ-VOUS GRATUITEMENT POUR DÉBLOQUER

TIREZ LE MEILLEUR PARTI DE VOS TRANSCRIPTIONS

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et débloquez la visionneuse interactive, les résumés IA, les traductions, les cartes mentales, et plus encore. Aucune carte de crédit requise.

    I spent $7,000… - Transcription Complète | YouTubeTranscript.dev