TRANSCRIPTIONEnglish

"More LUNATIC SOCIALIST Left-Wing Clowns!" | Keir Starmer Leadership Threatened By Andy Burnham

25m 14s3,979 mots596 segmentsEnglish

TRANSCRIPTION COMPLÈTE

0:00

Nick H is also on a voice note. Can a

0:02

new leader save Labor?

0:04

>> Morning Mark. It's Nick from Lua. The

0:06

only thing that can save Labor is a

0:09

coalition packed with the Green Party,

0:12

which is why it's so absolutely

0:14

imperative that the the right now unite

0:19

to prevent such a spectre from becoming

0:21

reality. Have a good weekend, Mark.

0:24

>> Nick, thank you for a great voice note.

0:26

I'm delighted to say with me live in the

0:28

studio, one of the most experienced and

0:30

respected journalists in the country,

0:32

the former executive editor of the News

0:33

of the World, Neil Wallace. And down the

0:36

line, a legend of talk, former Met

0:39

Detective Peter Blexley. Gentlemen,

0:42

welcome to the show. And Peter, good to

0:46

see you this morning. Can a new leader

0:48

save Labor?

0:50

>> Well, here we are. It's Select Socialist

0:53

Saturday.

0:55

Will it be Burnon? Will it be Raina?

0:58

Will it be streeting? Or as you've

1:00

pointed out, will Stalmer try and cling

1:02

on? Either way, we should actually

1:04

rename it, lose Labor Saturday, cuz

1:07

that's what the nation desperately

1:09

needs, having been swept to power with

1:12

such a huge majority on essentially what

1:14

was a protest vote just to get the tries

1:17

out. Once again, socialists have proven

1:20

continually that they are utterly unfit,

1:24

inappropriate, and incapable of running

1:26

the country effectively.

1:29

>> It's a great job if you can get it

1:31

though, isn't it, Peter? Because

1:33

Starmmer's replacement, if it happens,

1:34

will have up to three years and a

1:37

healthy majority. So, it's a prize that

1:40

will be fought over.

1:42

>> Yes. And that's all the more reason why

1:44

Stalmer is in this very already

1:46

undignified fashion going to cling on.

1:50

It's clear that he adores the trappings

1:52

of power. He seems drunk on power to me

1:56

and he will cling on. No, no matter

1:58

shamelessly it looks no matter how

2:01

damaging it is to his party and of

2:04

course in more broader terms to the

2:06

nation. He will have to be dragged out

2:09

of number 10, kicking and screaming all

2:12

the way. Although, if anybody ever

2:13

remembers watching him on a punch bag

2:16

some years ago, Stara kicking and

2:19

screaming really wouldn't be too much of

2:21

a challenge for a fouryear-old.

2:22

>> I'd rather the punch bag was running

2:25

Britain. It makes more sense. It's more

2:27

compelling. What about that, Neil

2:29

Wallace? You are the king of the

2:31

headline from Peter Blexley. We've just

2:33

heard the adjectives regarding Karma.

2:35

Shameless. damaging drunk on power.

2:40

>> Yeah.

2:42

>> Go figure.

2:43

>> Go figure.

2:43

>> And in other news.

2:44

>> Yes. So, what's new?

2:46

>> The Pope goes to church every Sunday.

2:48

>> That's right.

2:50

You're spot on, Peter. Of course. In

2:52

particular, particularly your

2:54

interpretation that Stalmar will cling

2:57

on. Uh I mean, don't forget there's not

3:00

many places you can get as many foreign

3:02

trips as he likes to get. you know, the

3:05

he he's not really too interested in

3:08

what happens back here in Great Britain,

3:11

but he does love a foreign trip, doesn't

3:12

he? He, you know, uh the big perk of the

3:16

job for him, I think, is his air miles.

3:18

But the problem is while he's doing

3:20

that, nothing is being resolved back

3:23

here. Have you noticed incidentally how

3:26

Rachel Reeves has essentially been put

3:28

in a box and she's not allowed out to

3:31

wander around make spouting her um her

3:35

her nonsense about the the enormous

3:38

amounts of growth she's generating etc

3:41

etc

3:41

>> she's been benched hasn't she

3:43

>> has totally totally the only time you

3:45

see her is at prime minister's questions

3:47

when she has to sit next behind star and

3:51

that's to make

3:51

>> and her main job is not to cry by the

3:53

way Yes. I'm sorry. You going to say

3:55

that's to make sure that

3:56

>> Well, she the real reason is uh to make

3:59

sure that she's forever branded with

4:01

him, but also she has to be make sure

4:04

that she doesn't laugh at the wrong

4:06

moments. Uh because that's rather

4:08

important with some of the things that

4:10

he comes out with how funny it would be

4:13

if she actually burst out laughing at at

4:15

his nonsense. But there's a serious

4:17

point here, isn't there? That you know,

4:20

we're having this conversation. Um,

4:23

again, as Peter pointed out, at at a

4:25

time of only two years into a five-year

4:28

parliament with a government that's got

4:31

400 MPs and it's chaos, you know, I I

4:36

one of the great things about this show,

4:38

I think, are those voice notes you get.

4:40

Yeah. And you hear ordinary people

4:44

coming in and giving their views from

4:47

Luborough, from Newcastle, from down

4:51

here in London, and they're ordinary

4:54

working people who just can't believe

4:57

what they're witnessing. And um I I'm

5:01

sure Peter probably like me agrees for

5:04

the idea that I do think we're stuck

5:07

with Star.

5:08

>> Wow. Well, that's a great question,

5:10

Peter. What do you think? Will Starmmer

5:12

cling on, undignified as it may be?

5:15

>> Well, let's rewind to the general

5:17

election campaign of 2024. And people

5:20

quite rightly use the analogy that

5:22

Starmer was carrying a Ming vase across

5:25

an ice rink. Um, as long as he didn't

5:28

drop it, he was going to get elected

5:29

into power. And of course, that's

5:31

exactly what happened. He wasn't elected

5:35

into Downing Street because he was seen

5:37

as a wonderful leader or that because he

5:40

had such a manifesto that chimed with

5:42

the public. He got into number 10 purely

5:45

and simply because millions of people

5:48

were sick to death of the Tory party of

5:51

their lamentable efforts at government

5:54

when they actually showed themselves to

5:56

be left-wing liberal flaky pathetic

6:00

progressives to be perfectly honest with

6:02

you. So he got in. He had a huge

6:04

majority. And what has been astonishing

6:07

is just how inept he is at politics. I

6:11

have never known a prime minister in my

6:14

living years who is so bad at the

6:17

dayto-day politicking. He gets it wrong

6:21

time and time again, which is why we've

6:23

had so many U-turns, which is why his

6:26

name is so derogatorily chanted at dance

6:30

matches, football matches, and many

6:32

other locations around the country, and

6:34

why there is a desperate need for people

6:36

to see him gone. But if he's gone

6:40

without a general election, we need to

6:43

be very very cautious because as you've

6:46

pointed out, what could come next?

6:49

Burnham, Raina, streeting, more of these

6:54

lunatic left-wing socialist clowns who

6:58

know that they are only ever good at

7:01

spending other people's money. And when

7:03

that's all run out, where is the

7:05

country? It's bankrupt. Well, that's the

7:08

problem. As Neil brilliantly pointed

7:11

out, Peter, our viewers and listeners

7:13

live in the real world. They work hard

7:16

and they get it. They can see that this

7:19

Labor project is not working. And to

7:21

replace the leader is the territory of

7:24

deck tears on the Titanic, isn't it?

7:27

>> Oh, it definitely is. And of course,

7:29

there will be media outlets and

7:31

commentators and writers and columnists

7:34

absolutely desperate to see Star go. So

7:37

they've got something to write and

7:39

comment about. But it could be an even

7:41

more dangerous thing for the nation

7:45

because if we get an even more left-wing

7:48

rampant socialist clown into number 10

7:52

Downing Street because there's not a

7:54

general election, then all they're going

7:56

to do is raise more taxes, spend more of

7:59

our money, waste more of our money, not

8:02

stop the illegal migration nonsense, and

8:05

and things will simply get worse and not

8:09

better.

8:10

>> That's the problem. Are we in a scenario

8:12

now, Neil Wallace, in which Sakir

8:15

Stalmer for his innumerable failings is

8:18

the least worst option.

8:19

>> Well, that's essentially what Peter is

8:23

pointing out there, isn't it? And it's

8:25

what frankly I've been going on about in

8:28

the studio for some months because I

8:31

don't believe

DÉBLOQUER PLUS

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement pour accéder aux fonctionnalités premium

VISUALISEUR INTERACTIF

Regardez la vidéo avec des sous-titres synchronisés, une superposition réglable et un contrôle total de la lecture.

INSCRIVEZ-VOUS GRATUITEMENT POUR DÉBLOQUER

RÉSUMÉ IA

Obtenez un résumé instantané généré par l'IA du contenu de la vidéo, des points clés et des principaux enseignements.

INSCRIVEZ-VOUS GRATUITEMENT POUR DÉBLOQUER

TRADUIRE

Traduisez la transcription dans plus de 100 langues en un seul clic. Téléchargez dans n'importe quel format.

INSCRIVEZ-VOUS GRATUITEMENT POUR DÉBLOQUER

CARTE MENTALE

Visualisez la transcription sous forme de carte mentale interactive. Comprenez la structure en un coup d'œil.

INSCRIVEZ-VOUS GRATUITEMENT POUR DÉBLOQUER

DISCUTER AVEC LA TRANSCRIPTION

Posez des questions sur le contenu de la vidéo. Obtenez des réponses alimentées par l'IA directement à partir de la transcription.

INSCRIVEZ-VOUS GRATUITEMENT POUR DÉBLOQUER

TIREZ LE MEILLEUR PARTI DE VOS TRANSCRIPTIONS

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et débloquez la visionneuse interactive, les résumés IA, les traductions, les cartes mentales, et plus encore. Aucune carte de crédit requise.

    "More LUNATIC S… - Transcription Complète | YouTubeTranscript.dev