TRANSCRIPCIÓNEnglish

I spent $7,000 on ANC headphones so you don't have to – 2026

29m 59s7,155 palabras1,003 segmentsEnglish

TRANSCRIPCIÓN COMPLETA

0:00

Hey, it's Jasper. And today we're

0:01

talking about the best premium active

0:03

noise canceling headphones. And as you

0:05

can see, I have basically all the latest

0:07

greatest options from Bose, Apple, Sony,

0:09

Sennheiser, Bowers & Wilkins, and more.

0:12

And I've been doing some testing. So, of

0:13

course, I've been using them outside to

0:15

get a sense for how they all perform

0:16

under real-world conditions. But then

0:18

I've also been doing some testing

0:19

inside. So, for example, this is my good

0:22

pal Mikey. He's a headphone testing

0:24

microphone. And I've been using him to

0:25

measure the active noise canceling

0:27

performance in all these. And I have

0:28

some pretty interesting results there.

0:30

Then I also have Clampi. He's a little

0:32

sketchy. I may have built him myself,

0:33

but he allows me to measure the clamping

0:35

force in all these headphones. So, I'll

0:36

talk about that as well as my overall

0:38

impressions on comfort. And then I've

0:40

also done some pretty extensive testing

0:41

on their microphones. So, you'll hear

0:43

how they all perform under both quiet

0:45

and noisy call conditions. And of

0:47

course, we'll talk about sound quality,

0:48

build quality, features, connectivity,

0:50

basically everything you'll need in

0:52

order to make an informed buying

0:53

decision. Before we dive in, one quick

0:55

note. I'm also working on a mega review

0:58

where I'll be comparing the premium

1:00

options against some of these budget and

1:01

mid-price ones. And yes, there are

1:03

actually a few that I really like. So,

1:05

be sure to subscribe so you don't miss

1:07

out on that. All my videos have no

1:08

sponsors. It's just my own testing, own

1:10

research, own opinion. And your support

1:12

really does go a long way. But, enough

1:14

of this groveling. Let's now get into

1:17

the video. To kick things off, let's

1:18

first level set on the prices. And

1:20

remember, this is as of recording in US

1:22

dollars in the United States. But also

1:24

remember that these prices do tend to

1:26

change pretty frequently. So, be sure to

1:27

check the latest. And I have included

1:29

links to all of these in the

1:30

description. Also, if you want to sign

1:32

up for deal alerts in any of these, be

1:34

sure to check out Dip. It's actually the

1:36

service that I built myself. And it just

1:37

allows me to send you an email if I ever

1:39

spot a good deal on the headphones that

1:40

you're interested in. So, then you can

1:42

buy them when their price dips. But now,

1:44

let's talk about active noise canceling

1:46

performance. To test this, I used Mikey

1:49

first to get a baseline measurement

1:50

where I'd have no headphones on. And

1:52

then I'd play a sound. And here's an

1:53

example measurement that I got with pink

1:55

noise. The Y-axis shows how loud. The

1:57

X-axis is the sound frequency. And then

1:59

I'd repeat this process but with

2:00

different set of headphones on his ears

2:02

and ANC on. And the difference between

2:04

the lines would be how much sound is

2:06

blocked by both passive and active noise

2:08

cancellation. And to try to avoid any

2:10

anomalies, I did it with jet engine

2:12

noise as well as pink noise. And I took

2:14

multiple measurements over multiple

2:15

days. So, I'm pretty happy with what I

2:16

got. But do keep in mind, I am just a

2:18

dude in a room and I'm not some

2:20

million-dollar lab. But now, let's look

2:22

at my preliminary results. This table

2:24

shows the average decibel reduction for

2:26

each headphone with ANC on. And as a

2:28

reminder, the more decibels reduced, the

2:30

better. I do say these are preliminary

2:32

results because after comparing them

2:33

with my own anecdotal testing, I

2:35

realized that it's only telling a

2:37

partial story. So, the good news is I

2:39

figured out why and I have some better

2:41

results that paint a more accurate

2:42

picture. The bad news is we're going to

2:44

have to align on the fundamentals of ANC

2:46

tech and some quirks of human hearing in

2:48

order to get to that. So, I'm going to

2:50

try to do double duty where I'm going to

2:51

explain all of this while testing the

2:54

microphones on all these so you can hear

2:55

how they perform. So, first, you'll hear

2:57

me using them in a quiet room. And then

2:59

about 10 seconds into each segment, I'll

3:01

play some background noise and you'll be

3:02

able to get a sense for how the

3:03

microphone handles noisy conditions. And

3:05

for reference, this is what that

3:06

background noise will sound like.

3:10

A lot of people say active noise

3:12

canceling works by playing an opposite

3:14

sound. But what does that actually mean?

3:15

Let's say you want to block an external

3:17

sound that's around 500 hertz. What's

3:19

the opposite of a 500 hertz sound? Well,

3:22

that doesn't exactly exist. But what

3:24

does exist is a 500 hertz sound that is

3:26

phase shifted. So, it's actually just

3:28

another 500 hertz sound, but it's timed

3:30

perfectly so that the peaks of the sound

3:32

waves that you want to neutralize are

3:33

perfectly out of sync with the peaks of

3:36

the waves you're creating to cancel it

3:37

out. When these two waves interact, they

3:39

end up netting out to silence. And this

3:40

is a process called destructive

3:42

interference. But crucially, this phase

3:44

shift mechanism gets a lot harder to

3:46

pull off above around 1,000 hertz or so.

3:49

And just for reference, this is what

3:50

1,000 hertz sounds like.

3:54

It's harder to cancel at higher

3:55

frequencies because they physically have

3:56

much shorter wavelengths. So, for

3:58

example, a 1,000 hertz sound wave is

4:00

around 1.1 feet long. And a 100 hertz

4:02

sound wave is 11 feet long. So, this

4:05

means that your margin for error with

4:06

producing that phase shifted sound is

4:08

much smaller for higher frequencies. If

4:10

you have an 11 foot long sound wave and

4:12

your phase shifted sound is off by,

4:13

let's say, 6 inches or so, you're still

4:15

going to cancel out most of that sound.

4:17

But if you're off by 6 inches on, let's

4:19

say, a 12 inch long sound wave, you're

4:21

not going to be canceling out much. And

4:23

it's really unfortunate that phase shift

4:25

ANC gets less effective above around

4:27

1,000 hertz or so because it turns out

4:29

that human ears are actually most

4:30

sensitive to sounds that are between

4:32

2,000 and 5,000 hertz. And to illustrate

4:35

this, I'm going to play two tones that

4:36

are actually being played at the same

4:38

level of loudness.

4:39

[Laughter]

4:42

See how you can hear the 2,000 hertz

4:44

tone much more clearly? Bringing this

4:45

back to ANC, since not all sounds are

4:47

created equal to human ears, this also

4:49

means that not all sound reductions are

4:51

created equal. And that means that

4:53

you're more likely to notice a sound

4:54

reduction that's around 1,500 hertz than

4:56

150 hertz. When we look at my revised

4:59

ANC results next, you'll see I applied a

5:01

weighting system that's actually called

5:03

A-weighting. And it more heavily values

5:05

reductions in sounds that humans are

5:06

more sensitive to and values reductions

5:08

in sounds that humans are less sensitive

5:10

to a little bit less. And I'm sure some

5:12

of you are probably screaming at the

5:13

monitor saying, "Hey Jasper, if phase

5:15

shift ANC basically stops working above

5:17

1,000 hertz, wouldn't that mean that all

5:18

ANC headphones would basically perform

5:20

the same above 1,000 hertz, too?" And

5:22

that's actually the really interesting

5:23

thing. Turns out, no. In these higher

5:25

frequencies, it's actually kind of where

5:26

the real ANC battle seems to be doing

5:28

its part.

5:29

I can see in my test measurements that

5:31

some headphones are more effective at

5:32

canceling out these mid-range sounds

5:34

than others. And I can prove that it's

5:35

not just from better passive isolation.

5:37

And while this mid-range ANC is not as

5:39

powerful as it is with those lower

5:40

frequencies, since humans are more

5:42

sensitive to that mid-range, even small

5:44

reductions here can make a meaningful

5:46

impact.

5:46

There's not much public information

5:48

about this, but I've been told by an

5:49

expert that in addition to phase shift

5:51

ANC, there's actually another mechanism

5:53

at play. It's called active damping. And

5:56

it works by using the diaphragm of the

5:58

speaker in the headphone to absorb sound

6:00

waves around the head.

DESBLOQUEAR MÁS

Regístrate gratis para acceder a funciones premium

VISOR INTERACTIVO

Mira el video con subtítulos sincronizados, superposición ajustable y control total de la reproducción.

REGÍSTRATE GRATIS PARA DESBLOQUEAR

RESUMEN DE IA

Obtén un resumen instantáneo generado por IA del contenido del video, los puntos clave y las conclusiones.

REGÍSTRATE GRATIS PARA DESBLOQUEAR

TRADUCIR

Traduce la transcripción a más de 100 idiomas con un solo clic. Descarga en cualquier formato.

REGÍSTRATE GRATIS PARA DESBLOQUEAR

MAPA MENTAL

Visualiza la transcripción como un mapa mental interactivo. Comprende la estructura de un vistazo.

REGÍSTRATE GRATIS PARA DESBLOQUEAR

CHATEA CON LA TRANSCRIPCIÓN

Haz preguntas sobre el contenido del video. Obtén respuestas impulsadas por IA directamente desde la transcripción.

REGÍSTRATE GRATIS PARA DESBLOQUEAR

SACA MÁS PARTIDO A TUS TRANSCRIPCIONES

Regístrate gratis y desbloquea el visor interactivo, los resúmenes de IA, las traducciones, los mapas mentales y mucho más. No se requiere tarjeta de crédito.

    I spent $7,000… - Transcripción Completa | YouTubeTranscript.dev