JUST IN: Mike Johnson gets TORCHED By Terminating Lawsuit SCREWING MAGA

forcing Speaker Johnson's hand on the

Epstein investigation. In a major

escalation tonight, the Attorney General

of Arizona and Congresswoman elect

Adalita Ghalva of Arizona are suing Mike

Johnson and they're suing him because

Grahalva has not been sworn in. So, what

does all this have to do with Jeffrey

Epstein? Because it does at its heart.

Grahalva is the final vote needed for a

bipartisan maneuver called a discharge

petition. A state attorney general sued

the speaker of the house over his

refusal to swear in a dulyeleed member

of Congress. And in that lawsuit,

Arizona attorney general Chris Maize did

not mince words at all.

>> So here's the scoop on what's going down

with Speaker Mike Johnson. The Arizona

Attorney General along with future

Congresswoman Adalita Galva has decided

to take legal action against him. This

is quite the twist, especially since

Galva hasn't even been sworn in yet. But

it turns out this lawsuit is all tied to

the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. In a

way, Galva's vote is crucial for a

bipartisan move known as a discharge

petition, which circumvents Johnson.

Arizona's attorney general, Chris Maize,

really didn't hold back in the lawsuit.

Johnson's refusal to swear in Galva has

led to a significant problem. A federal

judge in Arizona just landed a huge blow

to Johnson's entire legal stance on

this. The ruling wasn't just a setback.

The judge outright dismissed his

lawsuit, labeling his actions as a

blatant misuse of power. That's some

pretty intense language coming from a

federal judge, as they usually keep

things pretty neutral, even when they're

ruling against someone. But this judge

clearly felt that what Johnson did was

so over the top that it deserved to be

called out. The fallout from this ruling

is serious. Johnson has kept Galva from

being sworn in for months, leaving

around 800,000 people in Arizona without

any representation in Congress. Now, the

judge has stepped in to say that this is

unconstitutional and it needs to end

right now. Galva will be seated and

Arizona residents will finally have

their representative. Meanwhile, Johnson

has just experienced a crushing legal

defeat during his time as speaker.

Rahalva is the final vote needed for a

bipartisan maneuver called a discharge

petition that goes around Johnson. Goes

around Johnson because he does not want

a vote to release the full Epstein

files. This would go around him get that

vote to release the files. Graalva was

elected in Arizona 28 days ago, a whole

month. And Johnson has in that time used

every excuse not to swear her in. Let's

break down what's been going on with

Speaker Johnson and his rather

questionable moves regarding the

situation with Adalita Gava. So, here's

the scoop. Johnson has been stalling on

swearing her in as a member of Congress

after she won her election. You'd think

when someone wins a House seat, they

show up on opening day and take the oath

like everyone else, right? But not in

this case. Johnson has been throwing out

excuses, claiming there are some

election irregularities that need to be

sorted out first. Now, here's the

kicker. It's not his call to make that

decision. The House actually has

procedures in place for challenging

elections if members have concerns about

seating someone. But Johnson can't just

single-handedly decide that a dulyeleed

member can't be sworn in. By blocking

GAVA, he's leaving about 800,000 people

in Arizona without any representation in

Congress, which is pretty crucial,

especially now with the ongoing

government shutdown. This tricky

situation caught the attention of

Arizona's Attorney General Chris Maize.

He took a look at what Johnson was doing

and said, "This isn't right. Gava was

elected and she has every right to be

seated just like her constituents have

the right to be represented." Maize felt

that Johnson's actions were a violation

of those rights for what looked like

political reasons. So, he decided to

file a suit in federal court demanding

that Johnson seat Gava right away. The

legal process moved pretty quickly and

the judge recognized the urgency. After

all, every day Gava isn't seated means

another day her constituents lack

representation. And let me tell you, the

judge didn't hold back with the ruling.

It was a major blow for Johnson. The

judge declared that Johnson's actions

were constitutionally indefensible.

That's legal speak for saying, "You've

got no solid ground to stand on here.

There's no legal validity to what you're

doing. You're just abusing your power."

So, it looks like Mike Johnson's legal

battle has hit a brick wall, and not

just any wall. A judge effectively

terminated his defense. That's it for

him. Johnson can't keep this fight going

in court, and now the case is over. He

lost outright. To make matters even more

interesting, the judge ruled that Gaba

has to be seated right away. Now, why is

this such a big deal? Well, according to

the New Republic's report from October

22nd, Johnson was really seen as trying

to delay things on purpose. He was

delaying Grajava's seating to stall

Democratic votes, particularly around

the Epstein files and budget measures.

So, there wasn't any genuine concern for

election integrity at play here. It was

all about manipulating the House vote

counts. Grajava is a Democrat and her

being seated gives them an extra vote,

which could be critical for upcoming

issues like investigations into the

Epstein files, government shutdown

budget measures, and even potential

impeachment proceedings. Johnson thought

if he kept her from taking that seat, he

could maintain a better vote margin for

the Republicans. The reality though is

that he wasn't blocking her for any

valid reason. It was all about making it

easier for him to push Trump's agenda

through. But now that plan has

completely backfired. The judge not only

ruled against him, but did so in some

pretty strong terms, calling his actions

a flagrant abuse of authority and saying

they were constitutionally indefensible.

Ouch. That kind of language is going to

stick with Johnson. And you can bet

Democrats will be bringing it up every

chance they get. Every time he tries to

flex his authority as speaker, they'll

be right there reminding everyone that a

federal judge deemed his actions to be a

total overreach. This is politically

disastrous for him, and it's likely to

fuel criticism from both Democrats and

even some moderate Republicans who are

already fed up with his leadership.

According to MSNBC's report from October

26th, Representative Jaime Rascin called

Johnson's flop the most humiliating

subjugation of a speaker in recent

history. He went on to say that the

judge's ruling showed how disastrously

Johnson's attempts to shut things down

had backfired. The story is pretty clear

now. Johnson tried to outsmart everyone

by blocking a Democratic member, but he

ended up overstepping his bounds so

badly that a judge had to step in and

publicly call him out. Now he's left

looking weak and incompetent. And with

the stakes this high, the timing

couldn't be worse for him. Right now,

Mike Johnson is really feeling the heat

with his narrow majority in the House

and the looming government shutdown

crisis. House Republicans are all over

the place with some wanting to

compromise and reopen the government

while others are digging in their heels

and demanding concessions from the

Democrats. Johnson's been trying his

best to keep the caucus united, but this

recent court ruling has really knocked

the wind out of his sales. If he can't

win a legal battle over seating a

member, it raises big questions about

his ability to lead effectively. How can

he negotiate with the Democrats after