Trump FURIOUSLY ENRAGED After Supreme Court Justice PUBLICLY Demands COURTROOM Appearance

I'd love to be campaigning instead of

doing this because we built I built a

great company.

>> Former President Donald Trump came to

this courthouse in Manhattan making a

rare voluntary appearance before a

judge, not uh in one of the four

criminal cases against him, but as a

defendant in a lawsuit that could upend

his business empire. Now, last week, the

judge in this case, Arthur Angaran, he

ruled that Donald Trump committed years

of fraud by giving banks and insurance

companies and others uh financial

statements that inflated his wealth by

billions of dollars and inflated the

value of assets like skyscrapers and

golf courses. Uh, as punishment, the

judge said that he's taking away some of

Donald Trump's companies and that could

lead to taking away some of his prized

assets like Trump Tower. At lunch, he

called for the judge's disbarment. said

he should face criminal charges for his

handling of this case. This trial could

last three months, but Donald Trump was

here today. He may be back tomorrow and

at some point he's going to testify as a

witness.

>> So, former President Donald Trump made a

pretty rare voluntary trip to a

Manhattan courthouse recently. And get

this, he wasn't there because of one of

the four criminal cases against him.

Nope. He showed up as a defendant in a

lawsuit that could seriously shake up

his business empire. Last week, Judge

Arthur Angeran ruled that Trump had

engaged in years of fraud by providing

banks and insurance companies with

financial statements that exaggerated

his wealth by billions of dollars. He

also inflated the value of his assets,

like his skyscrapers and golf courses.

To top it all off, the judge decided to

take away some of Trump's companies,

which could mean losing some of his most

prized assets, including Trump Tower.

During lunch, Trump even called for the

judge's disbarment and claimed he should

face criminal charges for how he's

handled the case. Now, think about it.

Imagine being the president of the

United States, telling the world for

years that you're the most powerful

individual around and that no one can

tell you what to do. Then, out of the

blue, the chief justice of the Supreme

Court, who heads the entire federal

judiciary, publicly tells you to sit

down and follow the law like everyone

else. This week, Chief Justice John

Roberts did just that, delivering one of

the most astonishing judicial rebukes to

a sitting president in recent American

history. Sources inside the White House

say that Trump completely lost it over

this. Donald Trump committed years of

fraud by giving banks and insurance

companies and others uh financial

statements that inflated his wealth by

billions of dollars and inflated the

value of assets like skyscrapers and

golf courses. uh as punishment. The

judge said that he's taking away some of

Donald Trump's companies and that could

lead to taking away some of his prized

assets like Trump Tower. At lunch, he

called for the judge's disbarment. Said

he should face criminal charges for his

handling of this case. This trial could

last 3 months, but Donald Trump was here

today. He may be back tomorrow and at

some point he's going to testify as a

witness.

>> Trump's inflated wealth and all those

assets we've talked about, it's a wild

ride. So, let me fill you in on

something pretty big that happened

recently. Donald Trump has been tangled

up in a significant legal mess because

he tried to fire Federal Reserve

Governor Lisa Cook. Now, you might find

yourself thinking that a president can

just go ahead and do that, but that's

actually not the case. The Federal

Reserve is designed to operate

independently, which means it's supposed

to be shielded from political

shenanigans. But we all know Trump likes

to have things his way, and independence

doesn't quite fit into his playbook.

When things didn't go his way with Cook,

he decided to remove her because she

wasn't aligning with his expectations.

However, the courts quickly jumped in to

say, "Wo, hold on there. You can't just

fire people from the Federal Reserve

because you're unhappy with their

decisions. There are laws and

regulations in place designed to stop

presidents from having too much power."

But as we've seen, Trump wasn't very

keen on following those rules. His

attitude has always been along the lines

of, "I'm the president, so I can do

whatever I want, and if you don't like

it, that's your problem." Now, here

comes the interesting part. When the

courts instructed Trump's legal team to

show up in person to explain the firing

and to defend their case, they just

didn't bother. Instead of appearing,

they sent in written documents, but kept

skipping out on the in-person

appearances. And they kept pulling this

stunt repeatedly. Every time they were

told to show up, they basically shrugged

it off. But here's where it gets even

crazier. This wasn't just some local

district court judge getting frustrated.

This defiance ended up climbing the

legal ladder until it reached the

Supreme Court. And guess who was waiting

there? Chief Justice John Roberts, who

typically stays away from political

disputes, finally had enough of the

nonsense. On October 23rd, he put out a

rare public statement that legal experts

are calling the strongest rebuke to a

sitting president in decades. What he

said was pretty straightforward, but

pretty impactful. He made it clear that

no one, not even the president, is above

the requirement to show up when summoned

by the courts in the United States.

That's a firm reminder that the law

applies to everyone, even the guy in

charge. When Chief Justice Roberts made

a bold public statement calling out

Trump by name, it created a real stir.

It's a significant move, reminding the

president that he isn't above the law, a

huge deal that doesn't usually happen in

functioning democracies. Instead of

handling things quietly or letting the

case pass through the usual legal

process, Roberts chose to spotlight the

issue, setting the stage for a stark

confrontation between the executive

branch and the judiciary. When Trump

caught wind of it, he absolutely lost

it. Sources inside the White House

revealed that he went into a total fury.

According to Politico, a senior aid

shared that Trump was screaming about

Roberts showboating for the media, about

judges trying to make him look weak and

about courts overstepping their bounds.

Right away, he ordered his team to push

back forcefully against what he called

judicial harassment. It's ironic,

really. He views being required to show

up in court as harassment. This pretty

much sums up Trump's perspective. To

him, any attempt to hold him accountable

or make him adhere to the rules is just

an attack or unfair treatment. But

honestly, this situation is more than

just about one court case or one angry

outburst. It's a fundamental clash

regarding presidential power and the

rule of law. Throughout his presidency,

Trump has been pushing the limits of

executive authority, testing how much he

can get away with. For a long time, he

seemed to escape consequences, ignoring

court rulings or dragging things out

indefinitely. Now, though, Robert's

public stance changes everything. The

head of the Supreme Court is firmly

drawing a line, emphasizing that Trump

can't just ignore court orders or pick

and choose which laws apply to him. This

is a reality check for Trump, who feels

entitled to unlimited power, thinking he

should be able to fire anyone he pleases

or dismiss court orders he dislikes. The

Chief Justice's message delivered

publicly tells him he's mistaken. He