TRANSKRIPTEnglish

How to Visually Upgrade Your Music Brand: Art Direction Playbook (Mau P Edition)

41m 59s8,556 ord1,222 segmentsEnglish

FULLSTÄNDIGT TRANSKRIPT

0:00

So this is Ma P and this is Maurice

0:02

West. One of these artists was making a

0:04

few thousand dollars per show and one

0:06

can now get six figures plus per show.

0:09

And spoiler alert, it's the same guy.

0:11

And the difference between the two was a

0:13

rebrand, not a new logo, a new story and

0:16

position in the culture. Through the art

0:19

of rebranding, Mauitz Westine, better

0:21

known as MAP, was able to build a

0:23

multi-million dollar brand just by

0:25

following a few key steps. And today

0:27

we're going to walk through those exact

0:29

steps and how you can use the same

0:31

playbook if your project feels stuck,

0:34

stale, or misaligned. And this is a

0:36

controversial statement, but it's my

0:37

belief that most artists should be

0:39

thinking about rebranding now because of

0:42

where social media is going and what the

0:44

next phase is going to be. And later in

0:45

the video, I'll go into full detail of

0:47

why I believe this to be so. But if you

0:49

want to follow a similar path as Malp

0:51

and build an audience of millions and a

0:53

life of financial and creative freedom,

0:55

you'll have the major festival

0:56

headlines, prime set times, and global

0:59

demand. Today's topic is something

1:00

you'll need to understand. So, who am I

1:02

to even talk about this topic? My name

1:04

is Chris Alba, and for the last 12

1:05

years, I've owned and operated a

1:07

creative studio called The Cole

1:08

Creatives that's done exactly this for

1:11

thousands of artists and creative

1:12

companies. We've worked with some of the

1:14

biggest names in music, as well as some

1:16

of the most well-known companies in the

1:17

world. We've done countless rebrands as

1:19

well as building brands and stories from

1:21

scratch for many of today's top music

1:23

artists. We've done tens of millions of

1:25

dollars in business over the last 12

1:26

years. And we've been a part of the

1:28

success stories of countless artists

1:30

around the world. From our point of view

1:32

in today's landscape, brand is just as

1:35

important as the music. And we've seen

1:37

over and over once an artist gets their

1:40

brand and story right how quickly things

1:42

start to change and how fast an audience

1:44

can grow. and Mau P is a perfect example

1:47

of when this works. So, let's get into

1:49

it. Step one, decide if a rebrand is

1:52

right for you. So, if you're deciding on

1:54

whether or not to rebrand or reposition,

1:56

let's look at a few different scenarios

1:58

you may be dealing with. But first,

2:00

let's kick it to Malp and see what was

2:02

going on with him.

2:03

>> I don't even deem the first project too

2:05

successful, if I'm being honest. Like,

2:06

to me, I was always doing the the

2:10

Maurice West stuff and I always sort of

2:12

felt held back. I was always looking at

2:15

other DJs that were in the same sort of

2:17

sound or universe, whatever. And I'm

2:19

like, why are they succeeding in that

2:21

way and why is it not working for me?

2:23

You know, I thought like, I know music.

2:25

I think I'm a good DJ. I think I'm a

2:27

good producer. Uh, I know how the scene

2:30

works. I know what I want. I have the

2:32

vision, but it's just not something was

2:34

just not connecting in some way, you

2:36

know? like I played really big festivals

2:38

and there was like a small fan base and

2:41

the releases were doing good, but it

2:44

never really got to a point where it

2:47

felt like organic to me. I was still

2:50

digging for um for the gold or the

2:53

diamonds, I guess. And part of that

2:55

digging turned into like the switch up

2:59

that became Ma P.

3:01

>> So that's what Ma P was dealing with.

3:03

Let's look at some different scenarios

3:04

that you might be dealing with. Scenario

3:06

number one, stuck with no growth. No

3:08

matter how many followers or what your

3:10

engagement looks like, you've been

3:12

banging your head against the wall for

3:14

months, maybe even years with no growth.

3:16

There's just something that isn't

3:18

connecting with the audience. Maybe it's

3:20

time for a rebrand. Scenario number two,

3:23

everything all at once. So, for this

3:26

scenario, let's say you built a project,

3:28

but it was all over the place with

3:29

experimentation, and it's not really

3:31

clear who you are. There was great stuff

3:33

that was created, but overall it wasn't

3:35

a cohesive idea. It was throwing a bunch

3:38

of stuff at the wall to see what stuck

3:40

and what you liked making. Like any

3:42

artist, your first or second brand

3:44

normally is built on a foundation of

3:46

experimentation. You're trying different

3:48

things, seeing what you like as an

3:50

artist. You're honing your taste and

3:52

also seeing where you and the audience

3:54

may meet in a like-minded space. But now

3:56

enough time has gone by and you're clear

3:58

on what you want to do for the next few

4:00

years. And this time it's not based on

4:02

trends or mimicking your heroes. Now you

4:04

know what you want to make and you have

4:06

full clarity. So to express this

4:08

newfound clarity, maybe it's time for a

4:10

rebrand. Scenario number three, a

4:12

reputable reputation. So for example,

4:14

with my first project, much of the

4:16

industry knew me as a promoter. I threw

4:19

large scale parties in LA and I booked a

4:20

bunch of talent. And while I deeply

4:22

loved curating and creating these

4:24

events, I had quietly been studying and

4:26

learning how to make proper dance music.

4:28

When I was a concert curator, I also had

4:30

a corresponding DJ project that would

4:32

run alongside the events. With that

4:34

project, I was more of a DJ and less of

4:36

a producer. So once I started producing

4:38

and I had a grasp on the kind of sound

4:39

that I wanted to make, I decided to

4:41

rebrand. When I rebranded and started

4:43

the new project, I made sure that I had

4:45

distance from the promoter part of my

4:47

life and made it solely about the art,

4:49

music, and story. I focused heavily on

4:51

those elements and it grew 10 times

4:53

faster and larger than my previous DJ

4:56

brand. So, if there's a reputation on

4:57

the brand that may be an uphill battle

4:59

for storytelling, maybe it's time to

5:01

rebrand. Scenario number four, bad

5:03

packaging. So, in this scenario, there's

5:05

nothing wrong with the music, but the

5:07

brand's story and visual identity just

5:10

feels unclear. It's not cohesive, and

5:12

deep down, you know that if you were a

5:14

potential fan and you saw this project

5:16

and it wasn't yours, it'd likely be

5:18

confusing to you. So, in this scenario,

5:20

a rebrand could be retooling the story

5:22

and the look. You don't have to burn

5:24

everything down. You just need to

5:26

rebuild certain elements so it's clear

5:28

to the audience. If you find yourself in

5:30

this scenario, maybe it's time for a

5:31

rebrand. Scenario number five, a new

5:34

mission. So in this scenario, your

5:36

mission and your why, the reason that

5:38

you're building a music project and

5:40

career, your mission changed. You want

5:42

something new. Now, this could be as

5:44

simple as when you first started, the

5:46

whole reason you wanted to make music

5:47

was just for fun as a creative outlet.

5:50

But now the new mission is to build a

5:52

brand reputation and successful business

5:55

around your creative endeavors. Or it

5:57

could be the other way. Initially when

5:59

you got in, you had a mission of

6:00

building a big business in music. But

6:02

after attempting that for a matter of

6:03

years, you saw that you had to play by

6:05

the rules of the system and that killed

6:07

a lot of the fun of being creative in

6:09

the first place. You've now reentered

6:10

your mission on making sure your taste

6:13

drives everything you do. So a good

6:15

example of this is one of our clients,

6:16

Chris Lake. In the mid200s, he was a big

6:19

room and progressive house artist. He

6:21

had hits like Changes, Carry Me Away,

6:23

Only One, and Sundown. It was a very

6:25

specific kind of sound in a very

6:27

specific kind of scene. The brand was

6:29

polished and it was pure. His brand and

6:31

sound aligned with other similar artists

6:33

in the scene at that time like Dirty

6:35

South, Fetty Lrand, John Dalback, or

6:37

Funk Agenda. But as the brand went

6:39

forward, he started to evolve and around

6:41

2016 is when the rebrand started to take

6:43

place. The music was getting

6:45

progressively cooler and he found

6:46

himself with a new mission. So from 2017

6:49

on he rebranded as the more cool Chris

LÅS UPP MER

Registrera dig gratis för att få tillgång till premiumfunktioner

INTERAKTIV VISARE

Titta på videon med synkroniserad undertext, justerbart överlägg och fullständig uppspelningskontroll.

REGISTRERA DIG GRATIS FÖR ATT LÅSA UPP

AI-SAMMANFATTNING

Få en omedelbar AI-genererad sammanfattning av videoinnehållet, nyckelpunkter och slutsatser.

REGISTRERA DIG GRATIS FÖR ATT LÅSA UPP

ÖVERSÄTT

Översätt transkriptet till över 100 språk med ett klick. Ladda ner i valfritt format.

REGISTRERA DIG GRATIS FÖR ATT LÅSA UPP

MIND MAP

Visualisera transkriptet som en interaktiv mind map. Förstå strukturen med ett ögonkast.

REGISTRERA DIG GRATIS FÖR ATT LÅSA UPP

CHATTA MED TRANSKRIPT

Ställ frågor om videoinnehållet. Få svar från AI direkt från transkriptet.

REGISTRERA DIG GRATIS FÖR ATT LÅSA UPP

FÅ UT MER AV DINA TRANSKRIPT

Registrera dig gratis och lås upp interaktiv visning, AI-sammanfattningar, översättningar, mind maps och mer. Inget kreditkort krävs.

    How to Visuall… - Fullständigt Transkript | YouTubeTranscript.dev