Keir Starmer Publicly EMBARRASSED By King Charles At Worst Possible Time As Two Notes Emerge!

And hello everybody. Welcome back to the

channel. Guys, there's been a big

revelation come out and it surrounds

King Charles and K Starmmer. And funnily

enough, this comes probably the worst

time for K Star. Now, over the last

couple of weeks, all we've heard from

Karma is that he didn't know about Lord

Mandlesson. He didn't know about Peter

Mandlesson and his escapades prior to

appointing him to the role. Now, it

stinks. Absolutely stinks. And we've

been saying it for absolutely ever. And

everyone's been coming out and saying

that they've warned Starmmer. Starma was

warned. And now we've got a revelation

about King Charles. And King Charles

apparently reportedly wrote two separate

notes or expressing reservations about

Peter Mandlesson's selection as

Britain's ambassador to the United

States. Guys, we're going to break down

this story, go through what has been

said, but this does not look good for K

Star whatsoever. King Charles. I mean,

I've been very very critical on this guy

for a very long time. But, uh, now he

even warned Karma from appointing him as

the US ambassador. So, despite all of

these warnings, Kama still went ahead

with it. This guy needs to resign. Let's

get into it, shall we? So, what's been

said here, ladies and gentlemen? Well,

as stated, King Charles wrote two

separate notes expressing reservations

about Peter Mandlesson's selection as

Britain's ambassador to the United

States. When asked to formally approve

the appointment as constitutionally

required, the monarch reportedly

attached a note posing a question along

the lines, "Do you really think that's

white?" A second communication from

Buckingham Palace similarly conveyed his

majesty's misgivings about granting the

controversial pier such a prominent

diplomatic posting. The king and Kestama

also discussed the matter during their

regular weekly audience. According to

the private eye, reports indicate King

Charles was taken aback that the foreign

officials formal approval letter

contained a complimentary CV that failed

to mention Lord Mandlesson's previous

government resignations or his Epstein

connections. It comes as scrutiny on the

prime minister over his decision to

appoint Lord Mandlesson to the

Washington role continues. Now questions

are now being raised about whether

correspondence between the king and

ministers regarding the appointment will

feature in the forthcoming document

releases. Kstarma has pledged to publish

an extensive range of materials

connected to the peers selection with an

initial batch of files made public last

month and a further set of papers is

expected to follow though certain

documents will likely be held back.

However, ladies and gentlemen, this is a

big revelation. twice King Charles came

out and said, "Do you think this is a

good idea?" And also, I mean, this is

where there should be a little bit an

element of power. I mean, everyone's

always calling for King Charles to step

in and sort K star out as he's

destroying this country. And whilst I do

think King Charles is kind of

responsible for as to where we're going

as a country because he, you know, he

kind of supports this. Um again he had

no power or at least he probably does

have the power but probably not with

regard to this appointment of Peter

Mandlesson but at least came out and

said do you think this is a good idea

but more and more evidence coming out of

the way that Kama was alerted on this

appointment but still decided to go

through with it. Um, and again his

cleanup inside Westminster again once

the full story I mean we've already got

the full story really but as more

revelations come out this this guy's

position is untenable and should have

resigned at the time it all came to the

forefront. But yeah, another revelation

this time in regard to King Charles.

Guys, do let me know your thoughts on

that one down there in the comments.