TRANSCRIÇÃOEnglish

AirPods Pro 3's Noise Canceling BEATS WH-1000XM6 and Gen 2 QC Ultra! 🔥

10m 38s1,551 palavras248 segmentsEnglish

TRANSCRIÇÃO COMPLETA

0:00

The AirPods Pro 3's noise cancelling is

0:02

so good that it's better than the best

0:05

noise cancelling headphones from Sony

0:08

and Bose.

0:09

What? I mean, if we look at these

0:11

measurements, what is clear is that the

0:13

AirPods Pro 3 could be a more powerful

0:16

noise canceller than the Sony WH-1000XM6

0:20

and Gen 2 Bose QC Ultra, especially in

0:23

the lower to lower mid frequencies. So,

0:26

it can deal with loud, droning, rumbling

0:29

noises more effectively than the

0:32

headphones. Where the headphones are

0:34

better is against the upper mids and

0:37

treble region. With the Sony's having a

0:40

clear advantage here. But shouldn't the

0:43

headphones be better all around since

0:45

they're bigger and cover the ears

0:47

entirely? How can something so small, so

0:49

tiny, so cute be more effective against

0:53

the low frequencies than full-sized

0:55

headphones? Well, the only reason I can

0:58

think of is that when you're using

0:59

headphones, even if the ear cups are

1:02

covering the ears entirely, there is

1:04

still empty space inside. That is a

1:07

pocket of air and air is a fantastic

1:10

conduit of sound, which creates its own

1:13

resonances within the confined space of

1:16

the ear cups and which in turn has to be

1:18

dealt with by the noise cancelling

1:20

algorithm of the headphones. Whereas

1:23

with earbuds like the AirPods Pro 3 that

1:26

plug into the ear canal, there is very

1:28

little space for there to be resonances.

1:31

And that simplifies the process of

1:33

cancelling low frequency noises with

1:36

very long wavelengths. What the AirPods

1:39

Pro 3 is less effective against is

1:42

higher frequency noises with very short

1:45

and unpredictable wavelengths. And that

1:47

can be blocked more effectively with

1:50

layers of material, which is why

1:52

headphones are more effective because

1:54

they've got layers of material like

1:56

cushions, the ear cups, and the

1:58

electronics in the ear cups. In the

2:01

following samples, if you're listening

2:03

with earbuds or headphones, you can hear

2:05

the rumbling of low frequency noises

2:08

more on the headphones, but not on the

2:10

AirPods Pro 3. But on the AirPods Pro 3,

2:13

you can hear higher frequency noises

2:16

more.

2:48

This comparison may seem stupid. Like,

2:50

why is Aaron comparing earbuds to

2:53

headphones? These are very different

2:54

products, right? But the reason is

2:57

because some people might be wondering

2:59

if it's worth getting the most powerful

3:02

noise cancelling headphones, which are

3:04

the Bose Gen 2 QC Ultra and the Sony

3:07

WH-1000XM6,

3:09

or should they go for the most powerful

3:11

noise cancelling earbuds, the AirPods

3:13

Pro 3, which are even more portable than

3:16

these headphones? I'm simply here to

3:18

tell you that it's not so simple. Yes,

3:22

there are reasons to get the headphones

3:24

like the battery life. Their battery

3:26

life is longer than any TWS earbuds on a

3:30

single charge. So, if you're on a long

3:33

flight, you don't have to keep

3:34

recharging the headphones. They just

3:36

work continuously throughout the flight

3:38

on a full charge. Whereas the AirPods

3:41

Pro 3, well, they last between 6 to 8

3:44

hours on a single charge. And if they

3:47

run out of battery, you've got to put

3:48

them back into the case to charge. And

3:50

this means in that period, you won't

3:53

have any noise cancellation or music.

3:55

Well, unless you use the ones provided

3:58

by the flight, those

4:00

plastic headphones and earbuds, which

4:02

are usually quite

4:04

The headphones cable connection also

4:06

means that you can plug them directly

4:09

into the in-flight entertainment system

4:11

without needing to use a wireless

4:13

adapter. Well, some airlines do support

4:16

Bluetooth on their in-flight

4:17

entertainment systems also, but it's

4:19

still not so common as far as I can see.

4:22

On the other hand, the AirPods Pro 3 is

4:25

super tiny, convenient, and portable. As

4:28

we saw, it will be more effective

4:31

against the droning noises of the

4:34

plane's engine, which is basically very

4:36

loud and very low frequency rumbling

4:38

noises. Keep watching because we're

4:40

going to talk about how they also

4:42

compare in terms of mic quality,

4:44

transparency, and sound quality. As

4:47

always, links in the pinned comment if

4:50

you want to check their latest prices on

4:52

Amazon. Click here for Shopee. And for

4:54

more reviews like this one, get

4:57

subscribed and tap the bell button to

4:59

stay notified. In terms of microphone

5:01

quality on Android, they're all pretty

5:04

comparable in quiet conditions. In noisy

5:07

conditions with noise gating, you're

5:10

generally going to get slightly better

5:11

results with the AirPods Pro 3 because

5:14

the Bose doesn't amplify my voice as

5:17

loudly and the Sony's noise gating is a

5:20

little too aggressive such that it cuts

5:23

into my own voice. If you are using an

5:25

Apple device, the AirPods Pro 3 will be

5:27

capturing at a wider 10 kilohertz band

5:31

instead of the usual HFP 8 kilohertz.

5:33

So, voice capture is clearer, more

5:36

natural in general. This was tested in

5:39

both quiet and

5:42

noisy conditions using really loud cafe

5:44

noise and

5:46

wind noise from this fan.

5:51

I'm now making a phone call in a quiet

5:53

place using the AirPods Pro 3.

5:57

I'm now making a phone call in a quiet

5:59

place using the AirPods Pro 3.

6:03

I'm now making a phone call in a quiet

6:05

place using the Sony WH-1000XM6.

6:10

I'm now making a phone call in a quiet

6:11

place using the Bose QC Ultra

6:14

headphones, too.

6:19

I'm now making a phone call in a noisy

6:21

and windy place

6:22

using the AirPods Pro 3.

6:25

I'm now making a phone call in a noisy

6:28

and windy place using the AirPods Pro 3.

6:31

I'm now making a phone call in a noisy,

6:33

windy place using the Sony WH-1000XM6.

6:40

I'm now making a phone call in a noisy

6:42

and windy place using the Bose QC Ultra

6:44

headphones, too.

6:49

Now, if you want to compare its active

6:52

noise cancelling and call quality to

6:54

other products for just $1 per month or

6:57

more, you can access my secret weapon,

7:00

my personal database, which lets you

7:02

compare the samples A to B directly.

7:06

Hundreds of people have joined up

7:08

because this saves you so much time

7:10

being able to just cut through all the

7:12

marketing and compare the products

7:14

yourself [music] without visiting a

7:16

store. Most stores don't even let you

7:18

try the products

7:20

>> [music]

7:20

>> due to hygiene reasons. So, join now on

7:23

YouTube or Patreon through the links

7:26

below.

7:26

>> [music]

7:26

>> For transparency mode, the AirPods Pro 3

7:29

is a little better than the Bose QC

7:31

Ultra. There's a brighter, clearer, and

7:34

airier feeling. Whereas things are a

7:36

little darker on the Bose QC Ultra Gen

7:39

2. As for how they compare to the

7:41

Sony's, well, I've got to say that its

7:43

transparency is a little brighter

7:46

compared to the Sony WH-1000XM6.

7:49

But the Sony's transparency feels a

7:51

little more natural, maybe because it

7:53

isn't as bright as the AirPods Pro 3 in

7:56

the upper mids. Still, all of them have

7:58

fantastic transparency, great for

8:01

general awareness and verbal exchanges.

8:04

Some of the best transparency modes in

8:06

the market. For sound quality, you're

8:09

going to get a very different experience

8:11

from the AirPods Pro 3 versus the Sony

8:15

and Bose headphones. The most major

8:18

difference is that all of the action is

8:20

taking place in between the ears. So,

8:23

the sound staging feels more compact and

8:25

the bass is more impactful. Either the

8:28

Sony or Bose headphones will do better

8:31

for a wider, more enveloping sound stage

8:34

because the listening process is

8:35

different and now also involves the

8:38

outer ears, the pinna, and that creates

8:42

better spaciousness and height in the

8:44

sound stage. As for the sound quality

8:46

itself, the Sony sounds more visceral

8:50

and intimate. Whereas the Bose has a

8:52

more relaxed, laid-back signature

8:55

compared to the Sony's. Well, it's still

DESBLOQUEAR MAIS

Registe-se gratuitamente para aceder a funcionalidades premium

VISUALIZADOR INTERATIVO

Assista ao vídeo com legendas sincronizadas, sobreposição ajustável e controlo total da reprodução.

REGISTE-SE GRATUITAMENTE PARA DESBLOQUEAR

RESUMO DE IA

Obtenha um resumo instantâneo gerado por IA do conteúdo do vídeo, pontos-chave e conclusões.

REGISTE-SE GRATUITAMENTE PARA DESBLOQUEAR

TRADUZIR

Traduza a transcrição para mais de 100 idiomas com um clique. Baixe em qualquer formato.

REGISTE-SE GRATUITAMENTE PARA DESBLOQUEAR

MAPA MENTAL

Visualize a transcrição como um mapa mental interativo. Entenda a estrutura rapidamente.

REGISTE-SE GRATUITAMENTE PARA DESBLOQUEAR

CONVERSAR COM A TRANSCRIÇÃO

Faça perguntas sobre o conteúdo do vídeo. Obtenha respostas com tecnologia de IA diretamente da transcrição.

REGISTE-SE GRATUITAMENTE PARA DESBLOQUEAR

APROVEITE MAIS DE SUAS TRANSCRIÇÕES

Inscreva-se gratuitamente e desbloqueie o visualizador interativo, resumos de IA, traduções, mapas mentais e muito mais. Não é necessário cartão de crédito.

    AirPods Pro 3's N… - Transcrição Completa | YouTubeTranscript.dev