TRANSCRIÇÃOEnglish

Lakers WAIVING a Player to Sign Another Ball-Handler without Luka/AR a MUST? | Lakers BEST Options!

14m 19s2,809 palavras400 segmentsEnglish

TRANSCRIÇÃO COMPLETA

0:08

Welcome back everyone. Today's show is

0:10

brought to you by Prospects. And with

0:12

the Lakers right now, I think we can

0:14

point to an obvious problem. That being

0:16

the fact that without Luca Donic and

0:18

Austin Reeves, who they played their

0:19

first game without last night, getting

0:21

beat by the tanking Dallas Mavericks, a

0:24

team that had a 14game losing streak on

0:26

their own home court before the game

0:27

last night. Yeah, it didn't go too well

0:29

for them. I mean, beyond LeBron James,

0:32

they had very little shot creation or

0:34

ball handling ability. Yes, LeBron

0:36

played well with 30 points, 15 assists,

0:39

and nine rebounds, but a depart from

0:41

him, not much went right for their team.

0:43

Neither offensively or defensively.

0:45

After LeBron, they've tried to go with

0:47

guys like Luke Canard, Jake the Rabia, a

0:50

little bit of both Bronnie and Kobe

0:52

Bulkin off the bench to be their

0:54

secondary ball handler and secondary

0:56

playmaker. And simply put, it didn't

0:58

work out for them. Luke Canard played

1:00

decently well. I'm not going to go

1:02

against that one. If he made a few more

1:04

shots, then they actually might have won

1:05

this game. But if not for LeBron and

1:08

Luke Canard, pretty much nobody else

1:09

could do anything. Neither in regard to

1:12

playmaking, shot creation, or simply

1:14

initiating the offense. And it obviously

1:16

was a problem for their team. And with

1:19

that in mind here, could the Lakers

1:20

maybe go out and find a replacement,

1:23

wave somebody on their current team, and

1:25

then pick somebody up off the free agent

1:26

market that is playup eligible? Well,

1:29

yes, they actually could. At this point,

1:31

I think every option has to be on the

1:33

table. Even with the update that Luca

1:35

Donuch is trying to come back, is

1:37

seeking treatment in Europe that

1:39

hopefully will bring him back quicker

1:40

than expected. Even with that in mind

1:42

here, if the Lakers are going to have a

1:44

chance for when Luca may or may not come

1:46

back, they probably have to get some

1:48

help. Help that's not currently on their

1:50

team. I mean, Marcus Smart could

1:52

definitely help, but he's currently

1:53

hurt, may or may not be back soon, and

1:56

may or may not be fully healthy before

1:58

the postseason comes around. So, if

2:00

they're going to maintain a top three

2:01

seed, let alone even not fall to the

2:03

fifth seed, they might have to find

2:05

another playmaking and shot creation

2:07

option off the open market. So, who's

2:11

even out there that could potentially

2:12

help their team? Or even before that,

2:14

who should they wave from their team to

2:16

make a spot for that said player? Well,

2:19

let's take a look into that. And like I

2:21

said, yes, they could do this if they

2:22

want to. They do have enough space under

2:24

the first apron to wave somebody, then

2:27

replace them with a current free agent,

2:29

having roughly 630,000 below the first

2:32

apron, which is more than enough to sign

2:34

a current free agent on a pro-rated

2:36

veteran minimum.

2:38

So, first and foremost, they got to pick

2:40

somebody to wave off their team if

2:42

they're going to go this route. And you

2:43

can make an argument for a few different

2:45

players. I mean, if you're going to go

2:47

off their game last night, the only one

2:48

that didn't play happens to be Dalton

2:50

Connect or pretty much the only one that

2:52

didn't play apart from Ado. However, I

2:55

doubt they go that route due to him

2:57

being under contract, a guaranteed

2:59

contract for next season. So, if not

3:01

Dalton, then maybe a guy like Kobe

3:04

Buffkin. Yes, he played and played 3

3:06

minutes and 20 seconds last night, but

3:08

he is probably the least trusted, the

3:11

least proven on their team with a

3:13

guaranteed contract. And no, they can't

3:15

wave a two-way contract like Nick Smith,

3:17

Drew Timmy, or Chris Manion to be able

3:20

to create that roster spot. You got to

3:22

pick between a current 15-man roster

3:24

player that has a guaranteed contract

3:26

for the rest of this season. Maybe

3:28

somebody like Kobe Buffkin, again,

3:30

doubtful Dolan Connect, even though he

3:32

didn't play last night. or then maybe a

3:34

veteran like Maxiba. In my opinion,

3:37

probably not going to go this route

3:38

because he has given them decent minutes

3:40

this season. The problem with him is

3:42

that he obviously can't stay healthy. I

3:45

mean, whenever they have relied on him

3:46

whenever he's given decent minutes,

3:48

shortly after, he always tends to get

3:50

hurt. So, if they don't believe they can

3:53

stay healthy, don't believe that he

3:54

could help them come postseason, then

3:56

maybe it could be an option. But, I'd

3:58

still lean heavily toward Kobe Buffkin.

4:00

After all, they signed him and never

4:02

gave him an opportunity, never trusted

4:05

him enough to give him that opportunity.

4:07

And that carried over into last night,

4:08

even with virtually no playmakers or

4:11

shot creators available apart from

4:13

LeBron. So, that says a lot about him

4:15

and how they feel about him. In my

4:17

opinion, they simply don't trust him.

4:19

So, in my opinion, that would be the

4:21

obvious fake to point to. If they're

4:23

going to wave somebody, I think it

4:25

probably would be and probably should be

4:26

Kobe Buffkin. even though I do like Kobe

4:29

Buffkin. Simply put, they don't trust

4:31

him. They can't rely on him. And he

4:33

probably can't fill the role that they

4:35

currently need. So, let's say they wave

4:38

him. They wave him, open up a spot on

4:40

their team, and can sign somebody off

4:42

the free agent market. Who should they

4:44

sign? Well, there currently happen to be

4:46

a few different options that do happen

4:48

to be playoff eligible. One of which is

4:50

not Cam Thomas, just to cross that one

4:52

off the list. He got waved after March

4:54

1st, which is the playoff eligibility

4:56

deadline. If you're not a free agent by

4:58

that point, you can't sign with a

5:00

different team and still be playoff

5:01

eligible. So, no, it shouldn't be Cam

5:03

Thomas.

5:05

But if not Cam Thomas, who's left on the

5:08

open market that could fill a ball

5:09

handling, playmaking, and/or shot

5:11

creation role for their team at point

5:13

guard or shooting guard. Well, there

5:15

happen to be a few options left, many of

5:17

which are veteran options. I mean, if

5:19

they don't want to go that route and

5:21

want to keep it in house, I guess they

5:23

could elevate a current two-way contract

5:24

to a 15-man roster spot, I wouldn't go

5:27

that route, but they could have either

5:29

Nick Smith or Chris Manning to pick

5:30

from. Neither of which are very proven,

5:33

neither of which they gave an

5:35

opportunity to last night, even when

5:36

they could have. So, I really doubt they

5:38

go that route, but I guess you could

5:40

point to it. But if they don't go that

5:43

route, which again I don't think they

5:44

would or probably should, then they have

5:47

a few veteran options on the open

5:48

market. One of which happens to be CP3.

5:51

Yes, he did retire, but he probably

5:53

didn't want to retire in that way. I

5:55

guarantee that he did not want to retire

5:57

in that way. And he made it very clear

5:59

that he did not want to leave LA this

6:01

season. Did not want to move away from

6:03

family to simply play for a different

6:05

team this season. That left him with

6:07

only one other option, that being the

6:08

purple and gold. And obviously they

6:11

didn't have any mutual interest or

6:13

agreement at that point. The Lakers had

6:15

a full team or when they didn't have a

6:17

full team, they didn't really have a

6:19

need for another point guard. But now

6:21

that they do, could CP3 maybe want to

6:24

come out of retirement? Is he still in

6:26

shape? Is he still in the mentality of

6:28

wanting to play in the NBA, making one

6:30

final playoff run? Who knows? This

6:33

season, obviously, he didn't do very

6:35

much. Didn't really get to play. didn't

6:36

really get a fair shot in my opinion.

6:38

Playing 16 games with the LA Clippers in

6:41

which he played roughly 14 minutes per

6:43

game, averaging only three points per

6:45

game, three assists per game, roughly

6:47

one steal per game, and shot an

6:49

underwhelming 32% from the field and

6:51

33.3% from the three-point line.

6:54

However, last season he played in all 82

6:57

games, 82 out of a possible 82 for the

DESBLOQUEAR MAIS

Registe-se gratuitamente para aceder a funcionalidades premium

VISUALIZADOR INTERATIVO

Assista ao vídeo com legendas sincronizadas, sobreposição ajustável e controlo total da reprodução.

REGISTE-SE GRATUITAMENTE PARA DESBLOQUEAR

RESUMO DE IA

Obtenha um resumo instantâneo gerado por IA do conteúdo do vídeo, pontos-chave e conclusões.

REGISTE-SE GRATUITAMENTE PARA DESBLOQUEAR

TRADUZIR

Traduza a transcrição para mais de 100 idiomas com um clique. Baixe em qualquer formato.

REGISTE-SE GRATUITAMENTE PARA DESBLOQUEAR

MAPA MENTAL

Visualize a transcrição como um mapa mental interativo. Entenda a estrutura rapidamente.

REGISTE-SE GRATUITAMENTE PARA DESBLOQUEAR

CONVERSAR COM A TRANSCRIÇÃO

Faça perguntas sobre o conteúdo do vídeo. Obtenha respostas com tecnologia de IA diretamente da transcrição.

REGISTE-SE GRATUITAMENTE PARA DESBLOQUEAR

APROVEITE MAIS DE SUAS TRANSCRIÇÕES

Inscreva-se gratuitamente e desbloqueie o visualizador interativo, resumos de IA, traduções, mapas mentais e muito mais. Não é necessário cartão de crédito.

    Lakers WAIVING a… - Transcrição Completa | YouTubeTranscript.dev