Carney’s China Deal Backfires: Canada Faces Harsh New Demands From Beijing
完整文本记录
So, the prime minister goes to China,
but then someone's going to ask, "What
about your two MPs in in Taiwan right
now?" It distracts from the message. And
I wouldn't read too much into the
decision. I would say,
>> "Chinese envoy warns Canada against
sending MPs to Taiwan or warships
through the Taiwan Strait. This creates
a big problem for Mr. Carney.
Back in January, Mark Carney pulled two
Liberal MPs back from Taiwan as he was
preparing to travel to China to secure
his strategic partnership with the
country that he called the greatest
threat to Canadian sovereignty during
the election. Now that the deal is
signed, China is doing what everybody
warned Carney about before he made that
deal. They are adding new conditions and
putting Mark Carney in a corner.
Let's take a look.
Chinese envoy warns Canada against
sending MPs to Taiwan or warships
through the Taiwan Strait from the Glob
and Mail. The new quote unquote
strategic partnership that Mark Carney
struck with China this year would be
damaged if Ottawa sends more military
vessels through the Taiwan Strait or if
Canadian parliamentarians keep meeting
with officials in Taiwan. Beijing's
envoy says in an interview Thursday,
Wang D, China's ambassador, said he's
optimistic about warming ties between
Beijing and Ottawa, but laid down
expectations for how Canada deals with
the self-governed island of Taiwan going
forward. Canadian MPs and senators visit
Taiwan regularly on trips paid for by
the Taiwanese government and have done
so for decades. The trips have normally
included meetings with Taiwan's foreign
minister or its president or vice
president. Under former Prime Minister
Justin Trudeau, Canadian warships
transited the Taiwan Strait 11 times
over the objections of Beijing starting
in 2018. Under Mr. Carney's government,
a Canadian frigot has made one trip in
September 2025 along with an Australian
destroyer. The People's Republic of
China considers Taiwan, which lies 160
km off its coastline, to be a breakaway
province, and the straight between the
two an internal waterway. Taiwan, where
many from the losing side of China's
civil war fled in 1949, calls itself the
Republic of China. Quote, "There is only
one China in the world, and Taiwan is an
inalienable part of China's territory."
End quote. Mr. Wang said Thursday in an
interview, quote, "The Taiwan question
is a red line that should never be
crossed and is at the core interest of
China. It constitutes an important
political foundation for the bilateral
relationship between our two countries."
End quote. In January, two Canadian MPs
from the Governing Liberal Caucus cut
short a trip to Taiwan just before the
parliamentary delegation they were with
was due to meet Taiwanese President
Liang Ti and other officials. This
happened shortly before Mr. Carney's
meeting in Beijing. Quote, Canadian
parliamentarians, they have official
status, so of course if these
parliamentarians conduct any official
engagement with the Taiwan side, that
will be hurtful. End quote. Mr. Wang
said, quote, "Any official engagement
between China and Canada should only
happen between the People's Republic of
China and Canada." End quote. The envoy
said. So,
not even a few months after this
breakthrough conversation and all the
other terms that Mr. Carney used for it,
he probably used the term catalyze at
least once or twice. But not even a few
months after all of that, we now have
China saying, "Hey, yeah, so we signed
that deal, and by the way, you're not
sending anybody else to Taiwan."
This creates a big problem for Mr.
Carney. Because it all goes back to what
the article referenced in terms of those
two MPs being recalled from Taiwan right
before Mark Carney actually went to
China. A lot of people called it out. We
called it out as well. And we called it
out because it seemed to be Mark Carney
cowtowing to China and not wanting to
upset them prior to actually going
there. Well, why would it upset them? He
knows why it would upset them, which is
why he called them back. Now, the
Conservatives said, uh, another country
doesn't get to decide where are our
people actually get to go in the world.
So, the Conservatives left their MPs
that were already in Taiwan there. So
they actually met with the president and
they went met met with other officials
in Taiwan while the liberals retreated
home.
So, isn't it interesting that now we are
getting new instructions from the big
bosses over in China and those
instructions are telling Mark Carney
where he can and cannot send his members
of parliament that were elected by the
Canadian people, not the Chinese
government.
And I want to take everybody back to a
panel that CBC held when these two MPs
were actually recalled. This was before
Mark Carney actually had his discussions
in China. It was before he had his press
conferences. So this is very revealing.
>> Well, I don't think their communications
was the best done here. Um, I would say
I wouldn't read too much into the
decision. I would say what it is that
Kenda has to speak with one voice and
anything that is different from that. So
the prime minister goes to China but
then someone's going to ask what about
your two MPs in in Taiwan right now. It
distracts from the message and the
government of Canada has to speak with
one voice right now. And I think that is
actually the real the real thing at hand
and from political operations
perspective you want the focus to be on
what the communication of the prime
minister is doing not what other MPs are
doing. A lot of these trips, just to
give background, are like state
sponsored, so they take MPs who are not
parliamentary secretaries or ministers
to these trips, but I don't necessarily
always feel like they add necessarily
value. But it doesn't show a change in
our position on Taiwan or on China that
hasn't changed under Harper, Trudeau, or
Mr. Harney.
>> Okay, so she's saying, "Oh, don't read
too much into it.
Don't read too much into it." You know,
it's just because Canon wants to speak
with one voice. It's just they're
they're going to be a distraction.
That's that's the only reason he's doing
it. That's the only reason Mark Carney
is recalling these two MPs from Taiwan
right before his visit with China. Don't
read into us. Nothing to see here.
Got it. Just on that Vana, there there's
still going to be Canadian members of
parliament there, right? The
Conservatives who are there are not
coming home. And I know we draw a sharp
distinction here. don't know if they do
in mainland China. Uh it feels like they
don't. So like, you know, isn't any MP
there going to present the same
challenge, liberal or not?
>> I don't think it's any MP. I think it
would just definitely be their liberal
leader. So it is it is the prime
minister, but it's the same party. So I
think even from a China perspective or
anyone's perspective, it would be seen
as different. Um because he's the prime
minister, again, they have to speak with
one voice, but I don't think there'll be
confusion if there other MPs there. um
they don't take direction for the prime
minister necessarily in the same way. Uh
it is not the leader of their party. So
I don't think they'll be seen in the
same way.
>> Kate, uh how do you see it?
>> The confusion that's being created is by
calling the government MPs back from the
trip. uh if the presence of government
MPs in Taiwan is so troubling to China
uh that that would derail an entire