文本记录English

LAWYER: If Cops Say "Step Out of the Car" - Say THESE WORDS

8m 37s1,749 字数250 segmentsEnglish

完整文本记录

0:00

You're driving home from work. The red

0:01

and blue lights come on. A cop pulls you

0:04

over for driving 5 miles over the speed

0:06

limit. He walks up to your window, takes

0:08

your license, goes back to his cruiser,

0:11

and then comes back with a suspicious

0:13

look on his face. Because instead of

0:15

just handing you a ticket, he looks at

0:17

you and says the four words that makes

0:19

your stomach drop. Step out of the

0:21

vehicle. Now, here's what happens. In

0:24

the next 60 seconds, you're either going

0:26

to get back in your car and drive away

0:28

free, or you're going to hand that

0:30

officer everything he needs to search

0:32

you, test you, and maybe even arrest

0:35

you. And the crazy part, most people

0:37

don't even realize they're giving all

0:39

their rights away. Because there's a

0:40

massive difference between what you have

0:42

to do and what the cops want you to do.

0:45

And very few people know the line that

0:47

makes the difference. I'm Jeff Hampton,

0:49

the people's lawyer. And in this video,

0:50

I'm going to give you the exact words to

0:52

say to the cop when he stares back at

0:54

you and says, "Step out of the vehicle."

0:57

Here's what most people don't

0:58

understand. When a cop asks you to step

1:00

out of the car, it's not about your

1:02

safety. It's about access. Getting you

1:05

out of that vehicle is the single most

1:07

important move in their playbook, and

1:09

I'm going to show you why. The moment

1:11

you step out, four things happen. Number

1:13

one, the officer now has a clear line of

1:16

sight into your entire vehicle. Anything

1:18

he can see through your window, a bag, a

1:20

container, something suspicious sitting

1:22

on the top of your seat, now becomes

1:24

fair game for him to search under the

1:26

plain view doctrine. He didn't need a

1:28

warrant, and he didn't need your

1:29

permission. You merely standing up and

1:31

getting out gave him a line of sight he

1:33

didn't have before. Number two, now that

1:35

you're standing outside, nervous, with

1:38

cars whizzing by, and cops eyeballing

1:40

you, he may ask you to now perform some

1:43

field sobriety tests because he might

1:44

think he smells alcohol on your breath.

1:47

He'll want you to walk a straight line,

1:49

stand on one leg, follow a pen with your

1:51

eyes. And most people just follow along

1:53

and do it because they think they have

1:55

to. Number three, even if you pass those

1:57

field sobriety tests, the officer will

1:59

now say that he needs to do a quick pat

2:01

down of you for officer safety sake.

2:03

This is known as a Terry Frisk, and once

2:05

his hands are on you, he's feeling you

2:07

up for a lot more than weapons. And

2:09

finally, number four, and this is the

2:10

big one, he's planning on you to start

2:13

talking. Cops know this. Once you're

2:15

standing outside, uncomfortable and

2:17

anxious, they know most people start

2:19

running their mouth. "Officer, I didn't

2:21

do anything wrong. I'm just coming from

2:23

a friend's house. I I mean, that odor?

2:25

Maybe I just had one drink hours ago. I

2:28

swear I'm fine, officer." Every single

2:30

one of your statements is evidence. And

2:32

not only is the officer recording it, he

2:34

could choose to misinterpret it or

2:36

manipulate it to mean something you

2:38

never meant. So, here's where people go

2:40

wrong. The first person, they panic, and

2:43

they just do everything the officer

2:44

says. "Step out? Sure. Walk a line?

2:47

Absolutely. Search my car? Go right

2:49

ahead." They think cooperating will get

2:51

them home faster, but it won't. The

2:53

second person refuses everything. "I'm

2:55

not getting out of my car, and I don't

2:57

have to. You can't make me do anything.

2:59

I know my rights." And now the officer

3:01

writes down, "Suspect was aggressive,

3:04

confrontational, and uncooperative."

3:06

These all go straight into the police

3:08

report, and if you say it strong enough

3:10

and fast enough, sometimes the officers

3:12

might claim you made furtive movements

3:14

or acted in a way that was suspicious

3:15

enough that now maybe they can perform a

3:18

search without your consent. But think

3:20

about this from the officer's

3:21

perspective. He does this every single

3:23

day. It's routine for him. He's trained

3:26

to get you out of the car because a

3:27

standing person is easier to observe,

3:30

easier to test, easier to search, and

3:32

definitely easier to arrest. He knows

3:34

that once you're out and on your feet,

3:36

your nerves will definitely kick in. The

3:38

talking starts, and once the talking

3:40

starts, the case builds itself. He's not

3:42

going to tell you that everything you

3:43

say is going to be used against you. In

3:45

fact, he'll probably be very friendly

3:47

with you and want to spur more

3:48

conversation because he doesn't want to

3:50

make you aware that your mistakes will

3:52

help him do what he wants to do, which

3:54

is to keep you outside and ultimately

3:56

get you in the back of his patrol car.

3:58

Now, here's the part nobody tells you.

4:00

Under the Supreme Court case of

4:01

Pennsylvania versus Mims, a police

4:03

officer can order you out of the car as

4:06

long as he's performing a lawful traffic

4:08

stop. Why? Because the court said the

4:10

officer's safety interests outweigh your

4:13

constitutional rights inside your

4:14

vehicle. And a few years later, the

4:16

Supreme Court extended this ruling to

4:19

allow cops to pull out passengers of

4:21

your car, also. So, let me be crystal

4:23

clear. You do have to get out of the car

4:26

if the cops demand it. It's settled law.

4:29

But, here's what most people now get

4:31

completely wrong. They think stepping

4:33

out means giving up. They think that now

4:35

they're standing on the side of the

4:36

road, they have to basically do whatever

4:38

the cop say. That is not true. Stepping

4:41

out of your vehicle never gives cops

4:42

consent to search your vehicle. You

4:44

certainly don't have to answer

4:45

questions, and you never have to perform

4:47

field sobriety tests. Your

4:48

constitutional rights don't disappear

4:50

just because your feet have to hit the

4:52

pavement. And here's the other thing,

4:54

cuz nobody talks about this. Under Terry

4:56

versus Ohio, an officer can only perform

4:59

that pat down search if he has a

5:01

reasonable articulable suspicion that

5:04

you are armed and dangerous. He can't

5:07

just pat you down because you're

5:08

standing there, or because he wants to.

5:10

He must have a specific reason to

5:12

believe you have a weapon. But now,

5:14

you're in an impossible position. You

5:15

have to step out of your car because the

5:17

law requires it, but you don't have to

5:19

talk. You don't have to consent to a

5:21

search. You certainly don't have to blow

5:22

into a breathalyzer. The problem is that

5:25

nobody knows exactly what to say in this

5:27

moment. How do you comply with the law

5:29

while making it crystal clear you're

5:31

standing up for your rights? Here are

5:33

the exact words you use. Memorize them.

5:35

"Officer, I'm stepping out as you've

5:37

requested. I do not consent to any

5:40

searches. Am I free to go, or am I being

5:43

detained?" That's it, and let me break

5:45

down why every part of what I just said

5:47

works. "I'm stepping out as you've

5:49

requested." This shows you are clearly

5:51

complying with the law. No argument, no

5:53

resistance, and the cop cannot write

5:55

down that you were uncooperative or

5:57

acting weird that would allow him to do

6:00

more. "I'm stepping out as you've

6:01

requested. I do not consent to any

6:04

searches." This is critical. You're

6:06

drawing the line clearly, and you're

6:08

putting it on camera. If the officer

6:09

searches you or your vehicle after

6:11

you've said this, and he doesn't have

6:13

very clear probable cause to do so,

6:15

everything that he gathers can be thrown

6:17

out in court. "I'm stepping out as

6:19

you've requested. I do not consent to

6:20

any searches. Am I free to go, or am I

6:24

being detained?" These magic words force

6:27

the officer's hand. He now has to make a

6:29

choice. If you're free to go, the stop

6:31

is over. If you're being detained, he's

6:33

going to now have to articulate why.

6:35

Either way, you've put the legal burden

6:37

back on him. But what do you do when the

6:39

officer pushes back? Because you know he

6:42

will. If the officer looks at you and

6:43

says, "Okay, man, look, I'm going to let

6:45

you go, but only if you perform these

6:47

tests real quick." This is when you look

6:49

back at him and say, "Officer, I

解锁更多

免费注册以访问高级功能

互动查看器

观看带有同步字幕、可调节叠加层和完整播放控制的视频。

免费注册以解锁

AI 摘要

获取由 AI 立即生成的视频内容摘要、要点和结论。

免费注册以解锁

翻译

一键将字幕翻译成 100 多种语言。以任何格式下载。

免费注册以解锁

思维导图

将字幕可视化为交互式思维导图。一目了然地了解结构。

免费注册以解锁

与字幕聊天

提出关于视频内容的问题。直接从字幕中获取由 AI 驱动的答案。

免费注册以解锁

从您的字幕中获得更多

免费注册并解锁交互式查看器、AI 摘要、翻译、思维导图等。无需信用卡。