TRANSCRIPTEnglish

You Won’t Believe What Rupert Lowe Just Did To Starmer

12m 56s1,811 words277 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

One thing Rert Low makes no secret of is

0:04

his feelings towards our prime minister.

0:07

Uh in total, uh you've got a good tweet

0:11

here. We've got a PM who is economical

0:15

with the truth. Leaving him there as a

0:17

lame duck is probably better for the

0:20

other parties. Restore Britain leader

0:23

Rert Low discusses the scandal around

0:25

Kia Starma and whether he would support

0:27

a vote of no confidence in the PM.

0:33

One thing with uh Robert, if he's got

0:37

something to say, he'll turn around and

0:39

say it. No ifs, no buts. And he makes it

0:43

very clear in that video piece exactly

0:45

what he thinks about the whole situation

0:48

involving Star. So let's have a listen.

0:54

>> I think we've got a basically a prime

0:59

minister who in my view is economical

1:02

with the truth. I think let's talk about

1:05

Mandlesson on the Mandlesson issue. I

1:07

spoke against the appointment of

1:08

Mandlesson at the time. Donald Trump

1:11

described him as a He was rude

1:13

about Donald Trump. So on the face of it

1:16

at the time it was the most

1:17

extraordinary

1:19

appointment and one which didn't make

1:20

any any logical common sense.

1:24

Now it appears that the appointment

1:27

listening to Oie Robbins yesterday I

1:29

wasn't in the chamber on Monday. We

1:30

voted to bring him back on Tuesday

1:32

because we weren't happy with the

1:34

answers he gave. Uh so I think he's been

1:37

dealing as I say in half truths uh in

1:40

half lies whichever you want to define

1:42

them as in in half falsehoods probably

1:44

falsehoods and Ollie Robbins I think

1:47

made it quite clear yesterday that

1:48

actually that the prime minister's

1:51

office had made the decision to appoint

1:53

Peter Mandelon and and and what the

1:56

civil servants required to do is to find

1:58

a way to deliver that appointment. Do

2:02

you hear what he just said there about

2:04

Mandlesson the way round it went?

2:08

And I think he was very uh

2:12

diplomatic I suppose with with uh the

2:15

whole economical with the truth. Starmer

2:19

has a very uh large and recorded track

2:22

record of saying one thing and then a

2:25

little while later just going completely

2:28

in another direction.

2:31

even though he'd failed his uh his

2:34

vetting. You see?

2:35

>> So, so I I think on the Mandlesson

2:36

issue, it's more of the same. I mean, I

2:39

blame Blair Brown, Campbell Mandlesson,

2:42

and Derry Urban for the beginning of the

2:45

of the undermining of of the British

2:47

Constitution with all the there's no

2:49

such thing as a British Constitution,

2:52

RER. It's an English Constitution,

2:56

English Bill of Rights, English Act of

2:58

Settlement.

3:01

various reforms they did from the human

3:03

rights act to the you know creation of

3:04

the Supreme Court to the Equalities Act

3:07

all the things that they did that I

3:08

think had longlasting damaging

3:11

consequences for the way in which we're

3:12

governed and is probably part of the

3:14

reason why we've ended up with a human

3:17

rights lawyer like Kia Starmmer who I

3:20

think uh will meet himself coming around

3:22

a corner one day. So I don't I don't

3:25

like him. I don't respect him. I think

3:27

he's a very poor prime minister.

3:30

uh if I was forced to vote on whether he

3:32

should resign, I would vote for him to

3:34

resign. But half of me says actually

3:37

leaving him there as a lame duck is

3:40

probably better for the other parties in

3:44

leaving him there as a lame duck. I had

3:46

a another interesting conversation

3:48

yesterday.

3:51

Robert has made it very clear what he

3:55

thinks of Star. I don't like him. I

3:57

don't respect him. He's a I'm

3:59

paraphrasing, but a crap prime minister.

4:05

Tells you everything, doesn't it? Tells

4:08

you everything. But this whole lame duck

4:11

thing,

4:12

we all want Star Gone.

4:16

Now, I uh tend to agree with the point

4:19

of view of Vindicator Strikes Back.

4:22

uh if you haven't subscribed to him, go

4:24

and subscribe.

4:26

In that he said he suspects he'll be a

4:29

scorched earth. So if Star goes, he will

4:32

cause an immediate general election and

4:35

take everyone else down with him. But

4:38

let's just say he doesn't, right?

4:43

Who are the candidates who could replace

4:45

him? Ed Miband,

4:49

Angela Raina,

4:52

David Lammy.

4:55

Could you imagine a scenario within this

4:58

country where

5:02

we are left with a choice of one of

5:04

those three for example if Stalma was to

5:06

go.

5:09

So does he need leaving him place as a

5:11

lame duck

5:12

>> terms of the British public becoming

5:15

tired of of the Labour party and tired

5:18

of the offering which he's which he's

5:20

giving him giving the Chaos Islands away

5:23

all of the things that are completely

5:24

illogical. So I think to your point

5:26

there I I wasn't in the chamber if I'm

5:28

forced to vote on it I would vote I

5:30

would support a vote of no confidence.

5:34

I think many people would. I think many

5:38

people would. I mean, that comment about

5:39

the Chaos Islands right at the very end.

5:44

Says it all about the these deals which

5:48

are basically undermining our

5:51

security uh our our national security.

5:54

It's an absolute disaster.

5:58

If you analyze what's been going on in

6:01

this country over the last few years,

6:04

you've seen a very much systematic and

6:06

calculated change in the way things are.

6:10

And it's it's got progressively worse

6:13

over the course of time. If you look at

6:15

our our uh manufacturing, if you look at

6:18

our construction, if you look at our

6:21

towns and our cities, if you look at our

6:24

law enforcement, if you look at the

6:27

regionalization,

6:28

if you look at the mayors, if you look

6:30

at education, if you look at the cost of

6:33

things, if you look at the the general

6:36

look and feel, it's like and any

6:40

territory we have outside of the British

6:42

Isles, it seems like it's a slow inward

6:46

implosion to get to some kind of point.

6:50

Now

6:52

Karma and the majority of the front

6:55

bench for that matter, Sadique Khn is

6:58

another one are members of the Fabian

7:00

Society.

7:03

Now the uh motto of the Fabian Society

7:08

is effectively slowly by stealth and

7:12

their motto or their logo rather is a

7:15

wolf in sheep's clothing. So that tells

7:17

you everything that you you probably

7:20

want to know about that organization

7:22

they belong to. This is their website

7:25

here. You know, common endeavor,

7:28

building a stronger Britain,

7:31

right? Building a stronger Britain.

7:33

Pressing reset.

7:36

Pressing reset. That's on our

7:39

relationship with the EU. You can see

7:41

that there. The collection brings

7:43

together experts and policy makers from

7:46

the UK and Europe to explore what a new

7:48

relationship might look like. And you

7:51

can see MPs here. Stella Cesy, Le Liam

7:55

Byron, Liam Baron, what however you

7:57

bloody say his name. Uh, you know,

8:00

they're all involved in this. This is a

8:03

left-leaning

8:04

socialist think tank basically, uh, for

8:08

want of a better word. That is exactly

8:11

what the Fabian Society is.

8:15

And you you can see it here. They don't

8:18

hide any of this. They they don't

8:21

pretend to be anything but what they

8:23

are. And if you look at the about us,

8:28

you know, we are a left-leaning think

8:30

tank dedicated to new policy and

8:32

political ideas. We are a membership

8:35

movement active throughout Britain and

8:37

open to everyone on the left.

8:40

So, you know, there you go. And they've

8:43

been around since the 1800s. And also

8:46

what you have to remember as well, the

8:49

Fabians are not only

8:52

uh limited to Britain. They're in other

8:56

uh places as well around the globe. I

8:59

think New Zealand they're they're in and

9:01

and a few other spots also. So what you

9:04

get is that slow incremental

9:08

change over a period of decades till you

9:11

get to a point where it's like well hang

9:14

on a minute. What? What's all this

9:16

about? You know, and and it feels like

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.

    You Won’t Believe What… - Full Transcript | YouTubeTranscript.dev