Restore Britain's Rupert Lowe speaks out on Starmer, Mandelson and the future of British politics

Robert Lowe, the MP for great Yarmouth,

has spoken to GB News about everything

from the Mandlesson scandal to why he

launched his new party restore and his

side of what happened with reform before

his dramatic departure. But are Mr. Lan

restore a serious political force? Or

could another right-wing party simply

split the vote and risk letting a hard

left government slip into power?

Well, I'm delighted to welcome Rupert

Low to a special interview for GB News

to talk about the state of the world

really or the state of the nation.

Rbert, thank you for joining me. Tell

me, what is Restore's view of the

current political situation? The prime

minister fighting for his political

life, the Mandlesson scandal, and a

civil service that could possibly be

doing the right thing or one that's

utterly out of control. Where where's

Restore on that? Well, first of all,

Jacob, can I just say uh what a pleasure

it is to be back on GB News. It's been a

long time. I've almost forgotten how to

spell it. So, um I'm delighted that

you've invited me on. It's is good of

you. Um so, the answer to that question

is I think we've got a basically a prime

minister who in my view is economical

with the truth. I think let's talk about

Mandlesen on the Mandlesson issue. I

spoke against the appointment of

Mandlesson at the time. Donald Trump

described him as a He was rude

about Donald Trump. So on the face of

it, at the time it was the most

extraordinary appointment and one which

didn't make any any logical common

sense.

Now it appears that the appointment

listening to Ollie Robbins yesterday, I

wasn't in the chamber on Monday. We

voted to bring him back on Tuesday

because we weren't happy with the

answers he gave. Uh so I think he's been

dealing as I say in half truths uh in

half lies whichever you want to define

them as in in half falsehoods probably

falsehoods and Ollie Robbins I think

made it quite clear yesterday that

actually that the prime minister's

office had made the decision to appoint

Peter Mandelon and and and what the

civil servants required to do is to find

a way to deliver that appointment even

though he'd failed his uh his vetting.

You see,

>> so so I I think on the Mandlesson issue,

it's more of the same. I mean I blame

Blair Brown, Campbell Mammlson and Derry

Irvin for the beginning of the of the

undermining of of the British

Constitution with all the various

reforms they did from the human rights

act to the you know creation of the

Supreme Court to the Equalities Act all

the things that they did that I think

had longl lasting damaging consequences

for the way in which we're governed and

is probably part of the reason why we've

ended up with a human rights lawyer like

Kia Stalmer who I

uh will meet himself coming around a

corner one day. So, I don't I don't like

him. I don't respect him. I think he's a

very poor prime minister. Uh if I was

forced to vote on whether he should

resign, I would vote for him to resign.

But half of me says actually leaving him

there as a lame duck is probably better

for the other parties in terms of the

British public becoming tired of of the

Labour party and tired of the offering

which he's which he's giving him giving

the Chaos Islands away. All of the

things that are completely illogical. So

I think to your point there I I wasn't

in the chamber. If I'm forced to vote on

it I would vote I would support a vote

of no confidence. Your passwords are

your passwords only for your eyes. But

how safe is your phone or laptop or

tablet? Well, watch this. I press one

button and my phone is now shielded from

hackers and prying eyes. ExpressVPN is

your protector. Yes, you can protect all

your passwords fast across multiple

devices with ExpressVPN.

Premium, fast, and highly secure. Get

big peace of mind for a low cost. Click

the link in the description or scan the

QR code to get up to 75% off, plus four

extra months free. All backed by a

30-day money back guarantee. Protect

your online life today.

And that leaves you with your own party.

And the question is where is your own

party going? because JL Partners did

some polling on your name recognition

and your name recognition is lower than

mine which you would have thought was

almost impossible as you're the leader

of a party. Um but 92% of people don't

know who you are.

>> Well, Jacob, you're a national treasure.

So,

>> that's very flashy.

>> Uh we've all we've all heard of you

because of your sort of eccentricity

and your lounging in par looking looking

like you were sort of in the public

school prefect lounge. But you better do

some lounging because with with only 8%

of people knowing who you are,

>> I think a lot of basis a lot more than

8% of people. We were stopped by how

many people on the way here?

>> Yeah, but

>> three or four people this was a poll of

2,200 people. Um, your name recognition

actually gone down in the last year.

There's obviously a margin of error.

>> That's fine. Well, let's let's let's

let's see, Jacob, I think that's that's

not right. Okay. But Nigel has taken 30

years on the public stage to get to the

point where his party is sometimes at

30% in the polls.

How

>> it was at 30% in the polls. It no longer

is

>> 25 to 30. But how credible is it

>> to go from nothing? No name recognition,

no real public profile,

one MP on his own to winning an

election. Don't you need to be working

with the Conservative Party as you are

on the public health?

>> Maybe I'm deluding myself, Jacob, but

I'm going to continue to delude myself

and I'm going to continue to build my

party because I I don't think those that

survey is correct. But

>> I don't know who they who they who they

interviewed and who they talked to, but

our polling indicates that we are

polling somewhere between 8 and 10%.

None of the existing polls are naming us

yet. So I don't think that is consistent

with what you're asking me with regard

to that one which I think is a rogue

pole.

>> But deluding yourself really matters

because if you make it more likely in

2029 that we get a coalition of possibly

Angela Raina, Zack Palanski and whoever

the S&P leader is, that is disastrous

for the country. This isn't a game. This

is really serious. I do know that and I

and I can tell you reassuringly that a

lot of the people who are joining us and

we now have

131,000

uh uh signed up supporters now ours are

real supporters. I call the reform

membership the hotel California

membership because it's easier to sign

up. It's less easy to check check in.

It's less easy to check out. But but the

important point here is that from the

people we're seeing joining up, the

exciting thing is that a lot of them

have not been involved in British

politics for 25 or 30 years. So we are

offering them an opportunity to join a

party which actually I think is

reflective of what they want and what

they think. Now they haven't been

offered that. Neither have they been

offered it verbally, nor have the hands

actually shown that they're going to

deliver that. Now, we have, as you say,

not only said what we're going to do,

and we've got a lot more research

coming. We've got research coming on

border control. We've got research

coming. I'm doing a big economic paper.

I'm doing a big energy paper. We're