トランスクリプトEnglish

They REFUSE To Answer WHY!

12m 29s2,034 単語304 segmentsEnglish

全トランスクリプト

0:00

I absolutely have to share this clip

0:02

with you because this man here has

0:04

absolutely nailed it with his question

0:08

in that politicians will refuse to

0:10

accept, admit, and speak out loud where

0:13

the real hatred is coming from. To put

0:16

this into context, this was BBC question

0:18

time and as you can see on screen, this

0:20

was the question, what can be done to

0:22

protect the Jewish community? First of

0:25

all, let's have a listen to what Rachel

0:28

Milwood, deputy leader of the Green

0:30

Party, actually said about this, and

0:33

then we'll hear the question, and we'll

0:35

hear the nonresponse and the flatout

0:39

refusal to actually deal with the

0:41

question. Listen to what she says. First

0:43

of all,

0:44

>> the rise in anti-semitism in this

0:45

country is real. It's undeniable. It's

0:47

horrific and it's abhorren, and we are

0:50

all, I'm sure, disgusted by it. Um and

0:53

the Green Party stands absolutely united

0:56

in wanting to create a society without

0:59

hate where we actually learn to live

1:01

together with our differences that we

1:03

learn.

1:04

>> So that's what she said there. And this

1:07

man asked a very simple, very

1:10

straightforward, pertinent question

1:13

which we must answer if we're actually

1:16

to get anywhere and deal with the hate

1:19

that we do see in this country, which we

1:21

do. and it is on the rise and we do need

1:23

to deal with it. This attack on these

1:25

Jewish men just recently has obviously

1:28

made that brought that to the forefront

1:30

and it is not an isolated incident and

1:33

we absolutely must do something about

1:34

it. But we need to address where it

1:36

comes from first and there is a

1:38

suggestion for it. Come back to that in

1:40

a minute. Let's listen to his question

1:41

first. You've probably heard it but we

1:43

need to discuss that here. Listen to

1:44

this

1:45

>> lady from the Green Party. You just

1:47

stated that uh you've seen racial hatred

1:51

in the country. Could you please specify

1:54

where that hatred is coming from?

1:57

>> Uh not quite sure what you mean. Do you

1:59

mean from the general public?

2:01

>> And let's pause there. So the moderator,

2:04

not quite sure what you mean there, but

2:06

it's quite obvious what he means. He's

2:09

asking where this comes from, but the

2:12

moderator obviously already realizes in

2:15

my opinion that it's a difficult

2:17

question to answer and won't want to

2:20

answer. And I don't know why. So he

2:23

states the question again, isn't

2:26

>> well, she said there's racial hatred in

2:29

the country and I'd just like to know

2:31

where she thinks it's coming from.

2:37

And then she looks across at the

2:38

moderator as if to say, "Help me out

2:41

here." Don't want to answer that

2:43

question. Watch.

2:45

>> I mean, I was talking about the fact

2:46

that there is a rise in um racially

2:48

motivated crime, that kind of thing.

2:51

There's more and more hate crimes.

2:52

There's more reports of people feeling

2:54

uncomfortable, unsafe.

2:57

>> So, she repeats what the problem is,

2:59

which is a problem. More and more people

3:01

feel unsafe. There is more and more hate

3:04

crime against various groups. This is

3:06

not an isolated thing, but there is an

3:09

origin of it.

3:11

And she knows what the question is. She

3:13

just won't answer the question and looks

3:15

at the moderator as if to say, "We need

3:19

to deflect somehow here." But again,

3:21

listen, listen to the response.

3:23

>> There's more.

3:24

>> You said there's racial hatred. Where do

3:27

you think it's coming from?

3:28

>> Okay.

3:30

What are you getting at exactly?

3:32

>> What are you getting at?

3:35

It's a simple question. If there's a

3:37

rise in these kind of hate crimes,

3:40

there's a rise in this level of hate,

3:42

all of this sort of stuff and it is

3:44

coming from somewhere and there are

3:47

groups, we'll talk about it in a minute,

3:50

but it is obviously being derived

3:52

somewhere,

3:54

but she wants to deflect. What are you

3:56

getting at? She says, so she puts it,

3:58

it's pure deflection, classic deflection

4:02

of someone who doesn't want to answer

4:03

the question. We get this all the time

4:06

in court. We go to court. When you

4:08

answer ask a question, they don't want

4:10

to answer. They very often say, "What

4:12

are you getting at? Why are you asking

4:14

me that?"

4:16

And the response obviously is, "As

4:17

council in court is, I'm not here to

4:20

answer your questions. You are required

4:22

to answer my questions. So, I'll restate

4:24

the question again. Where is it coming

4:27

from?" And you would restate the

4:28

question. So, this this guy here has

4:30

restated the question more than once

4:32

here. But again, it's been deflected

4:35

back to him. What are you getting at?

4:37

Listen on.

4:39

>> Well, where where does you think this

4:41

racial hatred is coming from?

4:43

>> So, he restates it again. Simple

4:46

question. Where is it coming from?

4:49

Because it's coming from somewhere.

4:50

>> What do you mean? What specific sector?

4:52

>> I can actually say that where I think

4:53

it's coming from actually is that we

4:56

live in ripoff Britain and people are

4:58

having a really, really tough time.

5:02

And that's where she goes with it. We're

5:04

living in ripoff Britain and that's the

5:07

reason. So, does she believe that people

5:12

in the Jewish community are being

5:14

targeted, are being attacked

5:18

because of so-called ripoff Britain,

5:22

because of the price of eggs, as

5:23

somebody put it on eggs? Because I don't

5:26

accept that. That's not an answer. That

5:29

is again pure deflection. But you'll

5:31

realize it it took a minute here. We're

5:34

a minute into this clip from asking the

5:36

question at the very beginning. A full

5:39

minute is is quite a long time to avoid

5:42

and deflect answering a simple question.

5:45

And she ultimately diverts to talking

5:47

about ripoff Britain as she puts it. But

5:50

she goes a little bit further. Let's

5:51

listen a little bit more and then let's

5:52

let's talk about it.

5:53

>> They're struggling because their bills

5:55

are going up. They're struggling because

5:56

they can't afford their rents. Um I I

5:58

actually think this is the reality.

5:59

Australia because food is now so

6:01

expensive it's eye watering. What that

6:03

means is that what that means

6:05

>> and you'll notice the way she's doing

6:07

this of I'm now in control. I'm taking

6:09

control of this conversation. Uh you

6:12

just stay there while I tell you uh

6:15

what's really going on here. That's the

6:17

sort of body language I can see here

6:18

>> is that there's then a tendency to find

6:21

someone to blame. And I think that there

6:23

have been narratives

6:24

>> and you can see the face not really

6:27

accepting the response here. Find

6:29

someone to blame. I don't think anyone,

6:33

let me know in the comments what you

6:34

think, but I don't think anyone is using

6:37

ripoff Britain to find someone to blame

6:40

and that is causing a rise in racial

6:43

hatred. I don't accept that.

6:47

uh Zia's party is definitely one of

6:49

these narratives like

6:51

>> and now she goes to reform to blame

6:53

reform. So enough of listening to what

6:57

it isn't because clearly avoiding

7:00

answering the question here. Now there's

7:02

been a lot of talk. Um, now I've I've

7:05

avoided you taking sides on this whole

7:08

Palestine debate because quite frankly

7:10

my position on these things is I'm

7:12

against anytime anywhere that people are

7:15

getting hurt. Uh, whoever's doing it and

7:18

whoever's fault it is, I'm against it. I

7:20

don't like it. I will always speak

7:22

against it. But there are bigger broader

7:27

political issues, international issues,

7:29

diplomatic issues that I am, you know,

7:33

literally not qualified to talk about in

7:35

that sense. I can have opinions, but

7:37

it's just like anyone else has an

7:38

opinion. And I think when we get to big

7:40

issues like that, everybody might have

7:43

an opinion and it's equally valid or

7:47

equally worthless as the next person's

7:49

opinion. And unless you are in those

7:52

environments, you you won't necessarily

さらにアンロック

無料でサインアップしてプレミアム機能にアクセス

インタラクティブビューア

字幕を同期させ、オーバーレイを調整し、完全な再生コントロールでビデオを視聴できます。

無料でサインアップしてアンロック

AI要約

動画コンテンツ、キーポイント、および重要なポイントのAI生成された要約を即座に取得します。

無料でサインアップしてアンロック

翻訳

ワンクリックでトランスクリプトを100以上の言語に翻訳します。任意の形式でダウンロードできます。

無料でサインアップしてアンロック

マインドマップ

トランスクリプトをインタラクティブなマインドマップとして視覚化します。構造を一目で理解できます。

無料でサインアップしてアンロック

トランスクリプトとチャット

動画コンテンツについて質問します。AIを利用してトランスクリプトから直接回答を得られます。

無料でサインアップしてアンロック

トランスクリプトをもっと活用する

無料でサインアップして、インタラクティブビューア、AI要約、翻訳、マインドマップなどをアンロックしてください。クレジットカードは不要です。

    They REFUSE To Answer WHY! - 全文書き起こし | YouTubeTranscript.dev