トランスクリプトEnglish

This is way too underpriced | HIDIZS MK10 ArcSonics Review

13m 5s2,451 単語351 segmentsEnglish

全トランスクリプト

0:00

Yo, what's up? Now, today we are going

0:02

to be talking about this pair right

0:03

here, which is the soontobe releasing

0:06

Heidi's MK10. It is going to be

0:08

releasing on September 25th on Heidi.net

0:11

for a limited flash sale of $59.

0:15

And if you are buying from anywhere with

0:17

Amazon, it will be available on Amazon

0:20

as well for this price point with tax.

0:23

And with that out of the way, thank you

0:25

to Heidi's for sending these pair my way

0:27

because boy oh boy, I have a lot of

0:30

crazy things to talk about.

0:34

I'm I'm speechless. Let's just roll this

0:36

video.

0:39

[Music]

0:44

[Music]

0:49

Now before I begin, thank you to Audio

0:50

Monster and Heidi for actually making

0:52

this video possible. Definitely they are

0:54

not influencing me to say anything

0:56

positive or negative about this

0:58

particular IM. But definitely when I

1:01

talk about this right now, you're going

1:03

to feel like why is this guy so biased

1:05

about this particular pair? Let me give

1:06

you guys some context. This pair right

1:08

here, uh it was sent to us quite early

1:10

before we even know how much is the

1:13

price point because we asked and they

1:15

said they haven't finalized it. The only

1:16

vague answer that we could get back then

1:19

was this thing will be cheaper than the

1:22

MK12s.

1:23

That is like extremely vague. So the

1:27

MK12s is also $19 US. It is also a

1:30

single DD. So with that assumption,

1:32

knowing that this is a more entry level,

1:34

we will assume it is, you know, probably

1:37

around 120 $130 after listening to this.

1:40

But boy oh boy, I was quite happy that I

1:43

am very very wrong about the price

1:45

because you know I exaggerated the price

1:47

by twofolds. This is only $69 retail.

1:52

Nice. And as to why my personal judgment

1:54

is saying that this thing is priced at

1:57

so initially. Let's talk about it. But

2:00

before I get into that, a very very

2:02

quick rundown as to what you're getting.

2:04

Other than, you know, the very obvious

2:06

shiny nice looking IM that honestly

2:09

looks like a Star Wars guy on the face

2:11

plate, which I never bought Star Wars.

2:13

If you guys know who I'm talking about,

2:15

you guys probably know who I'm talking

2:16

about. And also a very good quality two

2:18

core cable, which apparently is OFC with

2:20

a nice matte brushed finish on the jacks

2:24

and the connectors. And also, yeah, it

2:26

ends in a balanced output, which is a

2:28

good thing. They give you two sets of

2:30

tips which you know kind of cutely

2:32

resemble spin tang hulu. And the black

2:34

translucent one is a more narrow bore.

2:36

So it will be better in terms of you

2:38

know slightly elevating the nuances in

2:42

the lower midbase. And this pair right

2:44

here is kind of more balanced. And as

2:47

always I personally prefer the more

2:48

balanced one. And one more particular

2:50

thing is that this thing also provides

2:52

you with some tuning nozzles which is

2:54

quite standard at this point. one is

2:56

going to be more focused on treble and

2:58

one is going to be more focused on bass.

3:00

The treble one I feel like it definitely

3:02

adds more aireriness without any uh I

3:05

would say compromises towards a risk of

3:07

siblance or a risk of being too sharp

3:10

but with that definitely it causes a

3:12

slight increase in thinness for the

3:15

mid-range. The bassy one is quite nice

3:17

but obviously it is not going to be that

3:19

significant. It is discernible but after

3:23

a few minutes you definitely forget

3:24

about it. Other than that, this thing is

3:25

also rocking a single DD config, a 10 mm

3:28

silicon carbide crystal diaphragm, and

3:31

as always, it is with a metal zinc alloy

3:34

shell. Fit in my opinion, it's honestly

3:36

quite okay. I don't really have any

3:38

problems about it. And given the fact

3:39

that even though it is quite quite

3:41

weighty, I feel like the ergonomics is

3:43

done quite well. So that after 2 to

3:45

three hours of listening, there's not

3:47

really any fatigue because this thing is

3:49

definitely more short nozzle. So you

3:51

guys will definitely don't feel like

3:52

it's a little bit too intruding. Now,

3:54

when we're talking about sound quality,

3:55

there's going to be two different

3:57

distinct things. First is the first

3:59

impressions and the second one is after

4:02

a proper burn-in. So, I use my Hibby R

4:05

six uh 2025 to properly burn it in for

4:08

30 hours and during the second listen.

4:10

And definitely, there's other very

4:12

discernable stuff that you won't cure

4:14

when you initially just started to use

4:16

this for like the first 5 minutes. But

4:18

nevertheless, my initial impressions on

4:20

this are actually quite positive.

4:22

Basically, it has a mild Vshade tuning

4:24

with some very specific emphasis on the

4:26

lower bass for some reason. Not subbase,

4:28

not midbase, but specifically the juicy

4:31

lower bass. That part is very dynamic.

4:33

That part is very musical. I like it a

4:36

lot. And this thing overall has a

4:37

neutral tonality as well as for some

4:40

reason, even though I said it's already

4:42

focused on the lower bass, crispy mids.

4:44

Crispy mids. It doesn't intrude you too

4:47

much, but crispy mids. Now, starting off

4:49

with the bass, this thing overall is

4:50

quite fun sounding. It is quite strong.

4:52

It is quite organic. The subbase, in my

4:54

opinion, is quite simple. It is rumbling

4:56

with some good levels of diffusion. So,

4:58

you do not feel like there's going to be

5:00

any congestion. This is true during the

5:03

first initial impressions. And once you

5:05

let it burn in for over 3 hours, it

5:07

definitely opens up a little bit more,

5:08

giving you more spaciousness, giving you

5:10

more aireriness. And like I said, this

5:12

will be the main part of your interest.

5:15

bass heads will definitely find this

5:17

thing interesting because the lower bass

5:19

will definitely sound texturally

5:21

alluring and very very musical. Y'all

5:23

definitely need to try this out because

5:24

when I wrote this, I wrote this in the

5:27

context where this thing is worth $120

5:29

to $150 give or take and it is only $70

5:33

MSRP and you can get it for 59. Why am I

5:37

selling this thing so hard? Presentation

5:39

of bass in my opinion is a little bit on

5:41

the aggressive side. Maybe because of

5:43

the lower bass being more amplified and

5:45

more punchy. I wrote it has decent

5:48

definition, but assuming this thing was

5:51

initially, you know, the more expensive

5:53

price point. So, there's that. 808s also

5:56

sound quite quick. 808s also sound quite

5:58

responsive and they give you a very good

6:00

bounce. So, I would say dynamics on the

6:03

lower end are definitely very very good.

6:05

Onto the next part, vocals. Now vocals

6:07

in my opinion the positioning is very

6:09

very well balanced in the sense where it

6:12

is not too recessed or too in your face.

6:14

It sits just in the same plane as

6:17

everything else which don't get me wrong

6:19

I don't mean that it's flat. It

6:20

basically just means that nothing is

6:22

overwhelming one to the other. And

6:23

vocals in my opinion feel quite tactile.

6:26

It feels quite crispy in a way which I

6:28

personally quite enjoy. And take note

6:30

that definitely this is something you

6:32

need to know when you're getting this.

6:34

If you are listening to any siblance

6:35

initially, it will definitely happen and

6:37

it took a good 30 hours of burnin to

6:39

basically, you know, let it loose. Let

6:41

the drivers go loose. So after 30 hours,

6:44

there's literally negligible amounts of

6:46

siblings unless you have, you know,

6:48

basically very bad files. Male vocals,

6:50

in my opinion, are presented in a more

6:52

natural and a more relaxed way. So it's

6:55

both engaging but also not too

6:56

fatiguing. Then as for female vocals,

6:58

definitely they are on the lighter side.

7:01

So you might occasionally feel like it

7:03

is a little bit more aggressive. But

7:05

with that being said, due to the crispy

7:07

nature and the more airy nature that

7:09

this thing has, expect some airy

7:11

overtones that accompanies female

7:13

vocals. Now going on to the mids, the

7:15

instruments, every single thing is quite

7:16

transparent. It is quite musical with

7:18

some levels of intent. Basically talking

7:20

about the tactility of the thing. You

7:22

feel like everything is responsive

7:24

enough for you to actually hear clearly.

7:27

Strings in my opinion are one of the

さらにアンロック

無料でサインアップしてプレミアム機能にアクセス

インタラクティブビューア

字幕を同期させ、オーバーレイを調整し、完全な再生コントロールでビデオを視聴できます。

無料でサインアップしてアンロック

AI要約

動画コンテンツ、キーポイント、および重要なポイントのAI生成された要約を即座に取得します。

無料でサインアップしてアンロック

翻訳

ワンクリックでトランスクリプトを100以上の言語に翻訳します。任意の形式でダウンロードできます。

無料でサインアップしてアンロック

マインドマップ

トランスクリプトをインタラクティブなマインドマップとして視覚化します。構造を一目で理解できます。

無料でサインアップしてアンロック

トランスクリプトとチャット

動画コンテンツについて質問します。AIを利用してトランスクリプトから直接回答を得られます。

無料でサインアップしてアンロック

トランスクリプトをもっと活用する

無料でサインアップして、インタラクティブビューア、AI要約、翻訳、マインドマップなどをアンロックしてください。クレジットカードは不要です。

    This is way too underpriced |… - 全文書き起こし | YouTubeTranscript.dev