TRANSCRIPTIONEnglish

Carney’s China Deal Backfires: Canada Faces Harsh New Demands From Beijing

17m 9s2,992 mots457 segmentsEnglish

TRANSCRIPTION COMPLÈTE

0:00

So, the prime minister goes to China,

0:02

but then someone's going to ask, "What

0:03

about your two MPs in in Taiwan right

0:05

now?" It distracts from the message. And

0:07

I wouldn't read too much into the

0:08

decision. I would say,

0:09

>> "Chinese envoy warns Canada against

0:12

sending MPs to Taiwan or warships

0:15

through the Taiwan Strait. This creates

0:18

a big problem for Mr. Carney.

0:25

Back in January, Mark Carney pulled two

0:28

Liberal MPs back from Taiwan as he was

0:30

preparing to travel to China to secure

0:32

his strategic partnership with the

0:35

country that he called the greatest

0:37

threat to Canadian sovereignty during

0:39

the election. Now that the deal is

0:41

signed, China is doing what everybody

0:44

warned Carney about before he made that

0:47

deal. They are adding new conditions and

0:51

putting Mark Carney in a corner.

0:54

Let's take a look.

0:57

Chinese envoy warns Canada against

1:00

sending MPs to Taiwan or warships

1:03

through the Taiwan Strait from the Glob

1:05

and Mail. The new quote unquote

1:07

strategic partnership that Mark Carney

1:09

struck with China this year would be

1:11

damaged if Ottawa sends more military

1:13

vessels through the Taiwan Strait or if

1:16

Canadian parliamentarians keep meeting

1:18

with officials in Taiwan. Beijing's

1:20

envoy says in an interview Thursday,

1:23

Wang D, China's ambassador, said he's

1:26

optimistic about warming ties between

1:28

Beijing and Ottawa, but laid down

1:30

expectations for how Canada deals with

1:33

the self-governed island of Taiwan going

1:35

forward. Canadian MPs and senators visit

1:37

Taiwan regularly on trips paid for by

1:40

the Taiwanese government and have done

1:42

so for decades. The trips have normally

1:44

included meetings with Taiwan's foreign

1:46

minister or its president or vice

1:48

president. Under former Prime Minister

1:50

Justin Trudeau, Canadian warships

1:52

transited the Taiwan Strait 11 times

1:55

over the objections of Beijing starting

1:57

in 2018. Under Mr. Carney's government,

2:00

a Canadian frigot has made one trip in

2:02

September 2025 along with an Australian

2:05

destroyer. The People's Republic of

2:07

China considers Taiwan, which lies 160

2:10

km off its coastline, to be a breakaway

2:13

province, and the straight between the

2:15

two an internal waterway. Taiwan, where

2:18

many from the losing side of China's

2:20

civil war fled in 1949, calls itself the

2:23

Republic of China. Quote, "There is only

2:26

one China in the world, and Taiwan is an

2:28

inalienable part of China's territory."

2:30

End quote. Mr. Wang said Thursday in an

2:33

interview, quote, "The Taiwan question

2:35

is a red line that should never be

2:38

crossed and is at the core interest of

2:40

China. It constitutes an important

2:43

political foundation for the bilateral

2:45

relationship between our two countries."

2:47

End quote. In January, two Canadian MPs

2:51

from the Governing Liberal Caucus cut

2:53

short a trip to Taiwan just before the

2:55

parliamentary delegation they were with

2:58

was due to meet Taiwanese President

2:59

Liang Ti and other officials. This

3:02

happened shortly before Mr. Carney's

3:05

meeting in Beijing. Quote, Canadian

3:07

parliamentarians, they have official

3:09

status, so of course if these

3:11

parliamentarians conduct any official

3:13

engagement with the Taiwan side, that

3:15

will be hurtful. End quote. Mr. Wang

3:18

said, quote, "Any official engagement

3:21

between China and Canada should only

3:23

happen between the People's Republic of

3:25

China and Canada." End quote. The envoy

3:28

said. So,

3:31

not even a few months after this

3:34

breakthrough conversation and all the

3:37

other terms that Mr. Carney used for it,

3:39

he probably used the term catalyze at

3:41

least once or twice. But not even a few

3:45

months after all of that, we now have

3:48

China saying, "Hey, yeah, so we signed

3:50

that deal, and by the way, you're not

3:52

sending anybody else to Taiwan."

3:55

This creates a big problem for Mr.

3:57

Carney. Because it all goes back to what

4:01

the article referenced in terms of those

4:02

two MPs being recalled from Taiwan right

4:05

before Mark Carney actually went to

4:07

China. A lot of people called it out. We

4:10

called it out as well. And we called it

4:12

out because it seemed to be Mark Carney

4:15

cowtowing to China and not wanting to

4:18

upset them prior to actually going

4:20

there. Well, why would it upset them? He

4:22

knows why it would upset them, which is

4:24

why he called them back. Now, the

4:25

Conservatives said, uh, another country

4:28

doesn't get to decide where are our

4:31

people actually get to go in the world.

4:34

So, the Conservatives left their MPs

4:36

that were already in Taiwan there. So

4:39

they actually met with the president and

4:40

they went met met with other officials

4:42

in Taiwan while the liberals retreated

4:44

home.

4:46

So, isn't it interesting that now we are

4:50

getting new instructions from the big

4:53

bosses over in China and those

4:56

instructions are telling Mark Carney

4:59

where he can and cannot send his members

5:03

of parliament that were elected by the

5:05

Canadian people, not the Chinese

5:08

government.

5:09

And I want to take everybody back to a

5:11

panel that CBC held when these two MPs

5:15

were actually recalled. This was before

5:18

Mark Carney actually had his discussions

5:21

in China. It was before he had his press

5:23

conferences. So this is very revealing.

5:27

>> Well, I don't think their communications

5:28

was the best done here. Um, I would say

5:31

I wouldn't read too much into the

5:33

decision. I would say what it is that

5:34

Kenda has to speak with one voice and

5:37

anything that is different from that. So

5:39

the prime minister goes to China but

5:41

then someone's going to ask what about

5:42

your two MPs in in Taiwan right now. It

5:45

distracts from the message and the

5:46

government of Canada has to speak with

5:47

one voice right now. And I think that is

5:49

actually the real the real thing at hand

5:52

and from political operations

5:53

perspective you want the focus to be on

5:55

what the communication of the prime

5:56

minister is doing not what other MPs are

5:59

doing. A lot of these trips, just to

6:00

give background, are like state

6:02

sponsored, so they take MPs who are not

6:04

parliamentary secretaries or ministers

6:06

to these trips, but I don't necessarily

6:08

always feel like they add necessarily

6:09

value. But it doesn't show a change in

6:11

our position on Taiwan or on China that

6:13

hasn't changed under Harper, Trudeau, or

6:15

Mr. Harney.

6:17

>> Okay, so she's saying, "Oh, don't read

6:20

too much into it.

6:24

Don't read too much into it." You know,

6:26

it's just because Canon wants to speak

6:29

with one voice. It's just they're

6:31

they're going to be a distraction.

6:32

That's that's the only reason he's doing

6:33

it. That's the only reason Mark Carney

6:35

is recalling these two MPs from Taiwan

6:37

right before his visit with China. Don't

6:40

read into us. Nothing to see here.

6:43

Got it. Just on that Vana, there there's

6:46

still going to be Canadian members of

6:48

parliament there, right? The

6:49

Conservatives who are there are not

6:50

coming home. And I know we draw a sharp

6:52

distinction here. don't know if they do

6:54

in mainland China. Uh it feels like they

6:57

don't. So like, you know, isn't any MP

6:59

there going to present the same

7:01

challenge, liberal or not?

7:02

>> I don't think it's any MP. I think it

7:04

would just definitely be their liberal

7:06

leader. So it is it is the prime

7:08

minister, but it's the same party. So I

7:10

think even from a China perspective or

7:12

anyone's perspective, it would be seen

7:14

as different. Um because he's the prime

7:16

minister, again, they have to speak with

7:17

one voice, but I don't think there'll be

7:19

confusion if there other MPs there. um

7:21

they don't take direction for the prime

7:22

minister necessarily in the same way. Uh

7:24

it is not the leader of their party. So

7:26

I don't think they'll be seen in the

7:27

same way.

7:28

>> Kate, uh how do you see it?

7:29

>> The confusion that's being created is by

7:32

calling the government MPs back from the

7:34

trip. uh if the presence of government

7:37

MPs in Taiwan is so troubling to China

7:41

uh that that would derail an entire

DÉBLOQUER PLUS

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement pour accéder aux fonctionnalités premium

VISUALISEUR INTERACTIF

Regardez la vidéo avec des sous-titres synchronisés, une superposition réglable et un contrôle total de la lecture.

INSCRIVEZ-VOUS GRATUITEMENT POUR DÉBLOQUER

RÉSUMÉ IA

Obtenez un résumé instantané généré par l'IA du contenu de la vidéo, des points clés et des principaux enseignements.

INSCRIVEZ-VOUS GRATUITEMENT POUR DÉBLOQUER

TRADUIRE

Traduisez la transcription dans plus de 100 langues en un seul clic. Téléchargez dans n'importe quel format.

INSCRIVEZ-VOUS GRATUITEMENT POUR DÉBLOQUER

CARTE MENTALE

Visualisez la transcription sous forme de carte mentale interactive. Comprenez la structure en un coup d'œil.

INSCRIVEZ-VOUS GRATUITEMENT POUR DÉBLOQUER

DISCUTER AVEC LA TRANSCRIPTION

Posez des questions sur le contenu de la vidéo. Obtenez des réponses alimentées par l'IA directement à partir de la transcription.

INSCRIVEZ-VOUS GRATUITEMENT POUR DÉBLOQUER

TIREZ LE MEILLEUR PARTI DE VOS TRANSCRIPTIONS

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et débloquez la visionneuse interactive, les résumés IA, les traductions, les cartes mentales, et plus encore. Aucune carte de crédit requise.