TRANSCRIPTIONEnglish

You Won’t Believe What Rupert Lowe Just Did To Starmer

12m 56s1,811 mots277 segmentsEnglish

TRANSCRIPTION COMPLÈTE

0:00

One thing Rert Low makes no secret of is

0:04

his feelings towards our prime minister.

0:07

Uh in total, uh you've got a good tweet

0:11

here. We've got a PM who is economical

0:15

with the truth. Leaving him there as a

0:17

lame duck is probably better for the

0:20

other parties. Restore Britain leader

0:23

Rert Low discusses the scandal around

0:25

Kia Starma and whether he would support

0:27

a vote of no confidence in the PM.

0:33

One thing with uh Robert, if he's got

0:37

something to say, he'll turn around and

0:39

say it. No ifs, no buts. And he makes it

0:43

very clear in that video piece exactly

0:45

what he thinks about the whole situation

0:48

involving Star. So let's have a listen.

0:54

>> I think we've got a basically a prime

0:59

minister who in my view is economical

1:02

with the truth. I think let's talk about

1:05

Mandlesson on the Mandlesson issue. I

1:07

spoke against the appointment of

1:08

Mandlesson at the time. Donald Trump

1:11

described him as a He was rude

1:13

about Donald Trump. So on the face of it

1:16

at the time it was the most

1:17

extraordinary

1:19

appointment and one which didn't make

1:20

any any logical common sense.

1:24

Now it appears that the appointment

1:27

listening to Oie Robbins yesterday I

1:29

wasn't in the chamber on Monday. We

1:30

voted to bring him back on Tuesday

1:32

because we weren't happy with the

1:34

answers he gave. Uh so I think he's been

1:37

dealing as I say in half truths uh in

1:40

half lies whichever you want to define

1:42

them as in in half falsehoods probably

1:44

falsehoods and Ollie Robbins I think

1:47

made it quite clear yesterday that

1:48

actually that the prime minister's

1:51

office had made the decision to appoint

1:53

Peter Mandelon and and and what the

1:56

civil servants required to do is to find

1:58

a way to deliver that appointment. Do

2:02

you hear what he just said there about

2:04

Mandlesson the way round it went?

2:08

And I think he was very uh

2:12

diplomatic I suppose with with uh the

2:15

whole economical with the truth. Starmer

2:19

has a very uh large and recorded track

2:22

record of saying one thing and then a

2:25

little while later just going completely

2:28

in another direction.

2:31

even though he'd failed his uh his

2:34

vetting. You see?

2:35

>> So, so I I think on the Mandlesson

2:36

issue, it's more of the same. I mean, I

2:39

blame Blair Brown, Campbell Mandlesson,

2:42

and Derry Urban for the beginning of the

2:45

of the undermining of of the British

2:47

Constitution with all the there's no

2:49

such thing as a British Constitution,

2:52

RER. It's an English Constitution,

2:56

English Bill of Rights, English Act of

2:58

Settlement.

3:01

various reforms they did from the human

3:03

rights act to the you know creation of

3:04

the Supreme Court to the Equalities Act

3:07

all the things that they did that I

3:08

think had longlasting damaging

3:11

consequences for the way in which we're

3:12

governed and is probably part of the

3:14

reason why we've ended up with a human

3:17

rights lawyer like Kia Starmmer who I

3:20

think uh will meet himself coming around

3:22

a corner one day. So I don't I don't

3:25

like him. I don't respect him. I think

3:27

he's a very poor prime minister.

3:30

uh if I was forced to vote on whether he

3:32

should resign, I would vote for him to

3:34

resign. But half of me says actually

3:37

leaving him there as a lame duck is

3:40

probably better for the other parties in

3:44

leaving him there as a lame duck. I had

3:46

a another interesting conversation

3:48

yesterday.

3:51

Robert has made it very clear what he

3:55

thinks of Star. I don't like him. I

3:57

don't respect him. He's a I'm

3:59

paraphrasing, but a crap prime minister.

4:05

Tells you everything, doesn't it? Tells

4:08

you everything. But this whole lame duck

4:11

thing,

4:12

we all want Star Gone.

4:16

Now, I uh tend to agree with the point

4:19

of view of Vindicator Strikes Back.

4:22

uh if you haven't subscribed to him, go

4:24

and subscribe.

4:26

In that he said he suspects he'll be a

4:29

scorched earth. So if Star goes, he will

4:32

cause an immediate general election and

4:35

take everyone else down with him. But

4:38

let's just say he doesn't, right?

4:43

Who are the candidates who could replace

4:45

him? Ed Miband,

4:49

Angela Raina,

4:52

David Lammy.

4:55

Could you imagine a scenario within this

4:58

country where

5:02

we are left with a choice of one of

5:04

those three for example if Stalma was to

5:06

go.

5:09

So does he need leaving him place as a

5:11

lame duck

5:12

>> terms of the British public becoming

5:15

tired of of the Labour party and tired

5:18

of the offering which he's which he's

5:20

giving him giving the Chaos Islands away

5:23

all of the things that are completely

5:24

illogical. So I think to your point

5:26

there I I wasn't in the chamber if I'm

5:28

forced to vote on it I would vote I

5:30

would support a vote of no confidence.

5:34

I think many people would. I think many

5:38

people would. I mean, that comment about

5:39

the Chaos Islands right at the very end.

5:44

Says it all about the these deals which

5:48

are basically undermining our

5:51

security uh our our national security.

5:54

It's an absolute disaster.

5:58

If you analyze what's been going on in

6:01

this country over the last few years,

6:04

you've seen a very much systematic and

6:06

calculated change in the way things are.

6:10

And it's it's got progressively worse

6:13

over the course of time. If you look at

6:15

our our uh manufacturing, if you look at

6:18

our construction, if you look at our

6:21

towns and our cities, if you look at our

6:24

law enforcement, if you look at the

6:27

regionalization,

6:28

if you look at the mayors, if you look

6:30

at education, if you look at the cost of

6:33

things, if you look at the the general

6:36

look and feel, it's like and any

6:40

territory we have outside of the British

6:42

Isles, it seems like it's a slow inward

6:46

implosion to get to some kind of point.

6:50

Now

6:52

Karma and the majority of the front

6:55

bench for that matter, Sadique Khn is

6:58

another one are members of the Fabian

7:00

Society.

7:03

Now the uh motto of the Fabian Society

7:08

is effectively slowly by stealth and

7:12

their motto or their logo rather is a

7:15

wolf in sheep's clothing. So that tells

7:17

you everything that you you probably

7:20

want to know about that organization

7:22

they belong to. This is their website

7:25

here. You know, common endeavor,

7:28

building a stronger Britain,

7:31

right? Building a stronger Britain.

7:33

Pressing reset.

7:36

Pressing reset. That's on our

7:39

relationship with the EU. You can see

7:41

that there. The collection brings

7:43

together experts and policy makers from

7:46

the UK and Europe to explore what a new

7:48

relationship might look like. And you

7:51

can see MPs here. Stella Cesy, Le Liam

7:55

Byron, Liam Baron, what however you

7:57

bloody say his name. Uh, you know,

8:00

they're all involved in this. This is a

8:03

left-leaning

8:04

socialist think tank basically, uh, for

8:08

want of a better word. That is exactly

8:11

what the Fabian Society is.

8:15

And you you can see it here. They don't

8:18

hide any of this. They they don't

8:21

pretend to be anything but what they

8:23

are. And if you look at the about us,

8:28

you know, we are a left-leaning think

8:30

tank dedicated to new policy and

8:32

political ideas. We are a membership

8:35

movement active throughout Britain and

8:37

open to everyone on the left.

8:40

So, you know, there you go. And they've

8:43

been around since the 1800s. And also

8:46

what you have to remember as well, the

8:49

Fabians are not only

8:52

uh limited to Britain. They're in other

8:56

uh places as well around the globe. I

8:59

think New Zealand they're they're in and

9:01

and a few other spots also. So what you

9:04

get is that slow incremental

9:08

change over a period of decades till you

9:11

get to a point where it's like well hang

9:14

on a minute. What? What's all this

9:16

about? You know, and and it feels like

DÉBLOQUER PLUS

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement pour accéder aux fonctionnalités premium

VISUALISEUR INTERACTIF

Regardez la vidéo avec des sous-titres synchronisés, une superposition réglable et un contrôle total de la lecture.

INSCRIVEZ-VOUS GRATUITEMENT POUR DÉBLOQUER

RÉSUMÉ IA

Obtenez un résumé instantané généré par l'IA du contenu de la vidéo, des points clés et des principaux enseignements.

INSCRIVEZ-VOUS GRATUITEMENT POUR DÉBLOQUER

TRADUIRE

Traduisez la transcription dans plus de 100 langues en un seul clic. Téléchargez dans n'importe quel format.

INSCRIVEZ-VOUS GRATUITEMENT POUR DÉBLOQUER

CARTE MENTALE

Visualisez la transcription sous forme de carte mentale interactive. Comprenez la structure en un coup d'œil.

INSCRIVEZ-VOUS GRATUITEMENT POUR DÉBLOQUER

DISCUTER AVEC LA TRANSCRIPTION

Posez des questions sur le contenu de la vidéo. Obtenez des réponses alimentées par l'IA directement à partir de la transcription.

INSCRIVEZ-VOUS GRATUITEMENT POUR DÉBLOQUER

TIREZ LE MEILLEUR PARTI DE VOS TRANSCRIPTIONS

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et débloquez la visionneuse interactive, les résumés IA, les traductions, les cartes mentales, et plus encore. Aucune carte de crédit requise.

    You Won’t Belie… - Transcription Complète | YouTubeTranscript.dev