TRANSCRIPCIÓNEnglish

I Spent $20,000 on AI Tools, Here's What Actually Works

18m 13s4,275 palabras580 segmentsEnglish

TRANSCRIPCIÓN COMPLETA

0:00

I feel like there's just a ridiculous

0:01

amount of AI tools out there right now.

0:02

And it's actually quite difficult to

0:04

work out which ones are worth your time

0:06

and money. For me especially, like I

0:08

value my own time. I don't want to be

0:09

messing around with all sorts of AI

0:10

tools and just finding out that they're

0:11

rubbish. But unfortunately, I have used

0:14

quite a few tools. And in this video, I

0:16

wanted to list some of the tools that

0:17

I'm actually using, some of the tools

0:19

that my team is using, some of the tools

0:20

that other people are using that are

0:21

actually useful and worth paying for.

0:24

Some of these aren't also fully AI, but

0:26

they do also sort of complement AI. Now,

0:28

of course, Claude is the big one. Claude

0:29

is the one that I've been covering a lot

0:31

on the channel. I feel like a lot of

0:32

people have been using because I think

0:33

Claude is very well designed for

0:35

productivity focused stuff. So, if

0:38

you're someone who needs to do research,

0:40

if you're someone who needs to work with

0:42

files on your computer, if you're

0:43

someone who wants to code, Claude, I

0:45

feel like they've done such a good job

0:47

of housing everything all in one,

0:48

especially when you look at their app.

0:50

So having the app and having the chat

0:52

functionality, the co-work

0:54

functionality, and the coding

0:56

functionality all in one place just

0:57

makes it super easy to use all of the

0:59

tools without having to constantly

1:01

change windows and sort of change

1:03

context or whatever. And I find myself

1:05

switching between all three very quickly

1:06

and easily because it's in one app. It

1:08

just makes my life a lot easier. Their

1:10

chat functionality is like any other

1:12

sort of chat AI tool which you can use

1:14

to do research, find answers, sort of

1:17

come up with strategies and stuff. I use

1:19

it a lot for just day-to-day things.

1:21

When I need to do some research or I

1:22

need to be educated on something or I'm

1:24

trying to find out about something, I

1:26

use Claw to do all that sort of stuff. I

1:28

of course change between the languages

1:30

quite often as well because you don't

1:31

want to be using their most powerful

1:32

model all the time. However, I do pay

1:35

for the max plan which is $200 a month,

1:37

which I think is worth it. Like I think

1:39

the sort of capabilities and stuff you

1:41

get with it are insane. Because of that,

1:42

I do actually tend to use OPUS more than

1:44

I probably should, but I've never hit

1:46

the limits, so I'm not really

1:48

complaining. Their co-work feature in

1:50

particular, I think, is super powerful

1:52

because co-work,

1:55

as the name suggests, it's kind of

1:57

imagine it like an AI agent doing work

1:59

for you in the background. And it can do

2:01

stuff on your computer. So, if you give

2:03

it access to a folder on your computer,

2:05

you can have it do stuff within that

2:07

folder. So, I've shown examples in the

2:09

past where if you have sort of financial

2:11

statements or something in a folder, you

2:13

need to get information from those

2:14

financial statements. You can do that

2:16

with co-work. You can also have it sort

2:18

of compare legal documents or whatever.

2:20

Have it compare information. And they

2:22

have a lot of other ideas here. So, you

2:24

can have it do all these different

2:25

things here. Organize my files. I think

2:27

that's a good one. So, let's just say

2:28

you have a folder which has a bunch of

2:31

different files like your downloads

2:32

folder and you wanted to organize all

2:34

those files for you can do that. You can

2:35

have it organize images, videos, or have

2:38

it do a specific thing. Maybe you're

2:39

looking for files with a specific file

2:42

name and to put them all in a folder.

2:43

You can have it do that sort of thing.

2:45

You can have it write stuff for you,

2:47

create a landing page, build a

2:49

dashboard. Those are actually very

2:50

similar to Claude code as well. You can

2:52

have it analyze Google Drive documents

2:54

because it doesn't just have to work on

2:56

your computer. If you have it connected

2:58

with the connectors functionality, and

3:00

they have a bunch of connectors here,

3:02

you can have it get information from

3:03

those places. So, it doesn't necessarily

3:06

just have to be on your computer. I

3:08

think this is another good example of

3:10

say you have information in a service

3:13

like Linear or Figma or whatever. It

3:15

could be Google Drive, but you want that

3:17

information on your computer. You want

3:19

it as a PDF, you want it as a CSV or

3:21

something like that. You can have it do

3:23

this for you without you having to do it

3:25

manually. And then they also have clawed

3:27

code which I've done a video on which I

3:29

would highly recommend just showing how

3:31

to use claw code in the app to make

3:33

stuff to make a website or whatever. The

3:35

app version is good. It's great. I think

3:37

it's great for doing sort of more basic

3:40

things um like building a website

3:41

building an app. Maybe if you're not

3:43

working on multiple projects at the same

3:44

time, even though you can have multiple

3:46

projects at the same time going, I think

3:48

if you're starting out, this is what I'd

3:50

recommend. If you're someone who's not

3:51

really a developer, who's not messed

3:53

around with code and stuff in the past,

3:54

but wants to build things, this is what

3:56

I'd recommend checking out and using.

3:57

OpenAI have their own version of Claude

4:00

Code, which they call Codeex, and

4:02

Codeex, I'd say, is just as good as

4:04

Claude Code. But it does depend because

4:06

some people say that one is better than

4:07

the other. I personally haven't seen too

4:10

much of a difference. What I end up

4:12

doing is if there's something I can't do

4:14

in Clawed Code or Claude Code is

4:15

struggling, then I switch to Codeex. And

4:17

then if Codeex is struggling, I switch

4:18

to Claw Code. So, I switch between the

4:20

two models. I am not tied to any of

4:23

these things. If a better model came out

4:24

tomorrow, if a better app came out

4:25

tomorrow, I would completely switch. I

4:27

don't care about any of these companies

4:28

or brands. I want to use whatever works

4:30

for me, whatever I think is best. Codeex

4:32

do have their own app as well, which I

4:35

really like. I actually think they've

4:36

done a really good job with this app

4:38

because you can use it for multi- sort

4:40

of agent coding. So, you can have a

4:42

bunch of different things going in here

4:43

and work on different projects all at

4:45

the same time. And I actually think the

4:46

app is really welld designed. Is it

4:48

better designed than clawed code? Um, I

4:51

think it depends on what you're looking

4:52

for. I think that's the great thing

4:54

about all of these apps and what they

4:55

can do. Um, it really depends on what

4:57

you're looking for. What I do like about

4:59

Codeex is that you can connect it to

5:00

your GitHub, you can connect it to an

5:02

IDE, you can see your lines of code,

5:04

what changes and stuff have been made.

5:06

Um, you have the normal chat box like

5:08

you would, and then you can see your

5:09

projects on the lefth hand side. And

5:10

again, you can work on multiple projects

5:12

at the same time. So when one agent is

5:14

working in the background on one

5:15

project, you can then work on another

5:17

project or another branch with codeex

5:19

and have multiple agents working at the

5:21

same time coding stuff in the

5:22

background. I do like the app. I think

5:24

they've done a really good job with it

5:25

and I think they've done a good job of

5:27

catching up to Clawed Code because when

5:28

Claude Code came out, it was super

5:30

popular. I feel like it blew up.

5:31

Everyone was raving on about it. So it's

5:33

good to see Chip now have Codeex, which

5:35

I think is just as good. The app that

5:37

I've been using though to code stuff and

5:39

to make stuff and to build stuff is an

5:41

app called Conductor. And what I really

5:44

like about Conductor is the way it

5:46

looks, the way it feels, and the way it

5:48

works. The sort of UX of this and the UI

5:51

design of this, I think, is awesome. On

5:52

the left, you have all of your projects

5:54

and repos. In the middle, you have your

5:56

chat box and stuff. And you can see your

5:57

branches at the top as well. And on the

5:59

right, you can see your files, you can

6:00

see the changes, and you can see your

6:01

terminal. Everything all in this one

DESBLOQUEAR MÁS

Regístrate gratis para acceder a funciones premium

VISOR INTERACTIVO

Mira el video con subtítulos sincronizados, superposición ajustable y control total de la reproducción.

REGÍSTRATE GRATIS PARA DESBLOQUEAR

RESUMEN DE IA

Obtén un resumen instantáneo generado por IA del contenido del video, los puntos clave y las conclusiones.

REGÍSTRATE GRATIS PARA DESBLOQUEAR

TRADUCIR

Traduce la transcripción a más de 100 idiomas con un solo clic. Descarga en cualquier formato.

REGÍSTRATE GRATIS PARA DESBLOQUEAR

MAPA MENTAL

Visualiza la transcripción como un mapa mental interactivo. Comprende la estructura de un vistazo.

REGÍSTRATE GRATIS PARA DESBLOQUEAR

CHATEA CON LA TRANSCRIPCIÓN

Haz preguntas sobre el contenido del video. Obtén respuestas impulsadas por IA directamente desde la transcripción.

REGÍSTRATE GRATIS PARA DESBLOQUEAR

SACA MÁS PARTIDO A TUS TRANSCRIPCIONES

Regístrate gratis y desbloquea el visor interactivo, los resúmenes de IA, las traducciones, los mapas mentales y mucho más. No se requiere tarjeta de crédito.

    I Spent $20,000… - Transcripción Completa | YouTubeTranscript.dev