ABSCHRIFTEnglish

Why Google Gave Up on Boston Dynamics

9m 48s1,847 Wörter299 segmentsEnglish

VOLLSTÄNDIGE ABSCHRIFT

0:00

In 2017, Google did something that

0:02

surprised everyone. They sold Boston

0:04

Dynamics. They were the most famous

0:06

robotics company on Earth. Viral videos,

0:08

millions of fans, and decades ahead of

0:10

the competition.

0:11

But behind the hype, they were a company

0:13

in crisis. They'd built the most

0:15

advanced machines ever, and nobody could

0:17

figure out what they were actually

0:18

useful for. So, why did Google give up

0:20

on them? To understand why the world's

0:22

best robots almost failed, we have to go

0:24

back to the very beginning.

0:26

Meet our main character, Marc Raibert.

0:29

In 1980, Raibert was an MIT professor

0:31

who realized that the way we were

0:32

building robots was fundamentally

0:34

broken. At the time, robots worked by

0:36

basically following a very precise

0:38

script. They could follow instructions,

0:40

but they couldn't adapt. Raibert's

0:43

breakthrough was something called

0:44

dynamic locomotion.

0:46

Instead of pre-programming every move,

0:48

he built robots that behaved more like

0:49

animals. They didn't think about

0:51

walking, they just reacted to it. Every

0:53

leg had sensors measuring lean, speed,

0:56

and force. If the robot starts to tip,

0:58

it didn't need to wait for a command

1:00

from a computer. It would just adjust

1:01

and stay balanced on its own. And

1:03

suddenly, these robots didn't look stiff

1:06

or controlled anymore. They looked

1:08

alive. In 1992, Raibert developed this

1:11

research into his own company, Boston

1:13

Dynamics. But you might be surprised to

1:15

hear that for the first decade, they

1:17

really weren't a robotics company at

1:18

all. They made their money through

1:20

government contracts, building software

1:21

like DI-Guy, which simulated human

1:24

movement for military training.

1:26

The robots were still just a side

1:28

project in the back of the lab. The

1:30

technology was finally there, but

1:32

Raibert still faced the one problem that

1:34

would haunt the company for the next 20

1:35

years.

1:36

What do you actually do with a robot

1:38

that can walk?

1:40

Fast forward to 2003. DARPA, the branch

1:43

of the Pentagon that funds high-risk

1:45

futuristic technology, decided it was

1:47

time to take robots out of the lab. They

1:49

had a specific problem. More than half

1:51

of the Earth's landmass is impossible to

1:53

reach with a wheeled or tracked vehicle.

1:56

If you want to carry gear over a steep

1:57

mountain or through a thick forest, you

1:59

need legs.

2:01

At the time, Boston Dynamics had the

2:02

most advanced robotic legs in the world.

2:04

So, they got to work. The result was Big

2:07

Dog. If you were on YouTube around 2008,

2:10

you probably remember this thing.

2:11

Instead of falling over like every other

2:13

robot would, Big Dog was able to recover

2:15

and stay standing. It didn't look like a

2:17

machine anymore, it looked like an

2:19

animal.

2:20

DARPA was impressed enough to give

2:22

Boston Dynamics a $33 million contract

2:24

to build a battlefield version called

2:26

the LS3. It was a beast. It could carry

2:29

400 lbs of gear and hike through mud or

2:31

snow at an incline.

2:33

On paper, it was exactly what the

2:35

military wanted. But in the real world,

2:37

it had one massive problem. To get that

2:39

much power and range, they had to use a

2:41

gas engine. And that engine was loud.

2:48

In a combat [snorts] zone where you're

2:49

trying to stay hidden, the LS3 was

2:51

basically a giant alarm bell for the

2:53

enemy.

2:54

So, the military eventually walked away,

2:56

saying they couldn't use a robot that

2:58

gave away their position from half a

2:59

mile away.

3:01

After years of development and millions

3:03

of dollars, Boston Dynamics had built a

3:05

masterpiece that they couldn't sell.

3:08

They had the technology, but still no

3:10

customer. So, instead of trying to fix

3:12

the noise problem, they decided to try

3:14

something even harder.

3:16

Building a humanoid.

3:18

Now, building a robot with four legs is

3:20

hard, but building one with two that

3:22

walks like a human is even worse.

3:25

With four legs, you have a stable base.

3:27

But when we walk, we're basically in a

3:29

constant state of falling forward and

3:31

catching ourselves. Their first attempt

3:33

was Petman.

3:34

It was a high-tech test dummy used to

3:36

see how military chemical suits and

3:37

camouflage held up while moving.

3:40

It could walk on a treadmill, but it had

3:41

to be held up by a huge overhead crane

3:44

and a bunch of cables. It proved they

3:46

could mimic human movement in a robot,

3:48

but it wasn't a standalone product yet.

3:51

That changed in 2013 with Atlas.

3:53

Atlas, once again, was built for a DARPA

3:56

challenge. This time, a challenge based

3:58

on the Fukushima nuclear disaster. The

4:00

idea was to build a robot that could go

4:02

into areas too dangerous for people, but

4:04

still use human tools, climb stairs, and

4:06

open doors.

4:07

>> [music]

4:07

>> And Atlas could actually do it. It was 6

4:10

ft tall and weighed over 300 lbs, and

4:12

there was a catch. While the viral

4:14

videos made it look like the future had

4:16

arrived, the reality was still pretty

4:18

messy. Atlas was incredibly expensive.

4:21

It used high-pressure hydraulics that

4:22

would leak, and it still needed a

4:23

massive leash or power cable to stay

4:26

running for more than a few minutes.

4:28

Boston Dynamics didn't even win the

4:30

DARPA challenge. Another team with a

4:32

slower, more practical robot did.

4:34

But once again, Marc Raibert had pushed

4:36

the boundaries of what was possible. But

4:38

he still hadn't built a product.

4:41

And this is where Google entered the

4:43

picture. Google, the internet search

4:45

engine, is entering a new frontier. It's

4:47

bought a cutting-edge robot technology

4:49

company. In 2013, Google started buying

4:52

up robotics companies. They were

4:53

building a new division led by Andy

4:55

Rubin, the guy who created Android.

4:58

Robots could eventually be the future of

4:59

labor. So, Google went on a spending

5:01

spree, buying Boston Dynamics and seven

5:04

other robotic startups all at once.

5:06

Google had money, and Boston Dynamics

5:07

had the best hardware on Earth.

5:09

But in reality, the two companies had

5:11

very different goals.

5:13

Google is a software company. They're

5:15

used to building apps and code that can

5:16

be updated in a day. They wanted a

5:19

product that could actually ship and be

5:20

put to work in a year or two. But Boston

5:22

Dynamics was not there yet. They were

5:24

still focused on research.

5:26

They were building one-of-a-kind

5:28

prototypes that cost millions of dollars

5:29

each and needed a full team of engineers

5:31

just to stay running.

5:33

By 2016, that conflict was clear. Andy

5:36

Rubin had left Google, and the company

5:38

realized they were pouring money into a

5:39

project that wasn't going to make a

5:40

profit anytime soon.

5:43

So, in 2017, they decided to cut their

5:45

losses and put Boston Dynamics up for

5:47

sale. It was a huge blow. If the biggest

5:50

tech company in the world couldn't

5:51

figure out how to make money with these

5:52

robots, who could?

5:54

The writing was on the wall. Marc

5:56

Raibert and his crew might soon be out

5:58

of a job.

5:59

But then, a Japanese company called

6:01

SoftBank stepped in. SoftBank wanted

6:04

products, and they knew how to get

6:05

Boston Dynamics there.

6:07

No more building prototypes just for the

6:08

DARPA challenges or potential government

6:10

contracts. Now, they had to build

6:12

something people would actually want to

6:14

use.

6:15

That shift had already quietly started a

6:17

couple years earlier, when in 2015,

6:19

Boston Dynamics introduced a fully

6:21

electric Spot.

6:22

It might not seem like it, but this was

6:24

a huge turning point. By switching from

6:26

gas engines and hydraulics to electric

6:28

motors and batteries, the robot became

6:30

much quieter and easier to manage. For

6:32

the first time, they had a machine that

MEHR FREISCHALTEN

Melden Sie sich kostenlos an, um Premium-Funktionen zu nutzen

INTERAKTIVER VIEWER

Sehen Sie sich das Video mit synchronisierten Untertiteln, anpassbarer Überlagerung und voller Wiedergabesteuerung an.

KOSTENLOS ANMELDEN ZUM FREISCHALTEN

KI-ZUSAMMENFASSUNG

Erhalten Sie eine sofortige KI-generierte Zusammenfassung des Videoinhalts, der wichtigsten Punkte und Erkenntnisse.

KOSTENLOS ANMELDEN ZUM FREISCHALTEN

ÜBERSETZEN

Übersetzen Sie das Transkript mit einem Klick in über 100 Sprachen. Download in jedem Format.

KOSTENLOS ANMELDEN ZUM FREISCHALTEN

MIND MAP

Visualisieren Sie das Transkript als interaktive Mind Map. Verstehen Sie die Struktur auf einen Blick.

KOSTENLOS ANMELDEN ZUM FREISCHALTEN

CHAT MIT TRANSKRIPT

Stellen Sie Fragen zum Videoinhalt. Erhalten Sie Antworten von der KI direkt aus dem Transkript.

KOSTENLOS ANMELDEN ZUM FREISCHALTEN

HOLEN SIE MEHR AUS IHREN TRANSKRIPTEN HERAUS

Melden Sie sich kostenlos an und schalten Sie interaktiven Viewer, KI-Zusammenfassungen, Übersetzungen, Mind Maps und mehr frei. Keine Kreditkarte erforderlich.

    Why Google Ga… - Vollständiges Transkript | YouTubeTranscript.dev